首页
登录
职称英语
Why do conservationists in Australia support the policy of killing cats? [br] [
Why do conservationists in Australia support the policy of killing cats? [br] [
游客
2023-12-24
25
管理
问题
Why do conservationists in Australia support the policy of killing cats? [br]
In July 2015, the Australian government announced a "war on feral cats" with the intention of killing over two million felines by 2020. The threat abatement plan to enforce this policy includes a mix of shooting, trapping and a reputedly "humane" poison.
Some conservationists in Australia are hailing this as an important step toward the rewilding of Australia’s outback, or the idea of restoring the continent’s biodiversity to its state prior to European contact. Momentum has also been building in the United States for similar action to protect many animals outdoor cats kill every year.
In opposition are animal advocates including the British singer Morrissey who are appalled at the rhetoric of a war on cats and promote nonlethal methods of controlling the negative effects of cats as being more effective and humane.
From a scientific perspective, there is little doubt that under particular geographic and ecological conditions, outdoor cats can threaten native species. This is especially true on oceanic islands whose wildlife evolved without cats and are consequently unadapted to feline predators. For example, when cats were introduced to Pacific islands by European colonists, their numbers grew until they frequently posed a threat to native wildlife.
Some conservationists claim that cats are the single largest threat to biodiversity regardless of ecological context. One oft-cited study in Nature Communications claims that 1.4 to 3.7 billion birds and 6.9 to 20.7 billion small mammals are killed by cats every year in the United States alone. Yet some have pointed out that the scientific case for this claim is shaky at best.
Why? Virtually every study of outdoor cats assumes that because cats in some habitats threaten biodiversity, they are a threat across all habitats everywhere. This is a projection from a small set of localized case studies to the world at large. In other words, a guesstimate.
选项
A、To kill the cats by shooting, trapping and poisoning.
B、To apply nonlethal methods to keep the influence under control.
C、To relocate the cats out of the continent to restore the ecology.
D、To find ways of protecting other animal species rather than killing the cats.
答案
A
解析
事实细节的找寻与判断。原文第一段列举了猎杀野猫的措施,与选项A相符。选项B中“nonlethal” (非致命的)为动物保护拥护者的主张,选项B错误。选项C和D在文中没有涉及。故本题应选择选项A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3301290.html
相关试题推荐
Obama’sEnergyPolicyWhiletheGulfofMexicooilsp
Obama’sEnergyPolicyWhiletheGulfofMexicooilsp
Obama’sEnergyPolicyWhiletheGulfofMexicooilsp
Obama’sEnergyPolicyWhiletheGulfofMexicooilsp
Obama’sEnergyPolicyWhiletheGulfofMexicooilsp
Obama’sEnergyPolicyWhiletheGulfofMexicooilsp
SomeAmericancollegesarestate-supported,othersareprivately______,andsti
Innovationistsclaimedthatevenifpolicymakerschangethecourse,theprospec
Ifyoucarrythisarrogantattitudetotheconference,youwill______anysupport
VeteransofWorldWarIIreceivedgreatersupportfromthegeneralpublicthanl
随机试题
Whatisthemaintopicoftheinterview?[br][originaltext]M:Today,asourgu
Howmuchdoesonecupofcoffeecost?[originaltext]M:Here’saten-dollarbill.
Whenwethinkofgreenbuildings,wetendtothinkofnewones—thekindofh
[originaltext]EverytenyearstheUnitedStatesgovernmentcountsthenatio
Livingisrisky.Crossingtheroad,drivingacar,flying,swallowinganasp
医学行为是否有利于医学科学发展和揭示人类的生命奥秘是A.医德评价的人文标准 B
患者男,35岁。因急性中毒性感染伴休克,拟采用糖皮质激素合并抗生素进行治疗。
患者,女性,患有风湿性关节炎及慢性心脏病,由于病情需要,现需服用普鲁卡因胺,该患
“见贤思齐,见不贤而内自省也”是说明( )是教师职业道德修养的重要方法。A.向
道德规范是一种A.法律性规范 B.强制性规范 C.制度化、外化的规范 D.
最新回复
(
0
)