首页
登录
职称英语
In the beginning, E. Mavis Hetherington was looking for as much pathology as
In the beginning, E. Mavis Hetherington was looking for as much pathology as
游客
2023-12-17
64
管理
问题
In the beginning, E. Mavis Hetherington was looking for as much pathology as the next person.
It was the early 1970s, with the American family in free fall, and she fully expected that her just-launched study. of the impact of divorce would find dysfunction and plenty of it: parents unable to cope, maladjusted children with long-term difficulties. By almost any measure-emotional, social or ecademic-"we expected them to blow it."
Yet here’s the surprising thing about her families, with all their couplings and uncouplings and even recouplings during the years that followed: the vast majority of parents rebounded from the pain and upheaval. Resiliency overshadowed pathology. And by the time the children were young adults, considering marriage and families of their own, Hetherington discovered at least 75% coping fairly well--some very well--with life.
Divorce, it seems, is not predestined.
Now at the close of her pioneering career, Hetherington, 75, wants to get the word out. More than that, with the publication of For Better or for Worse: Divorce Reconsidered, she wants to change the public debate about divorce.
Her book offers reassurance to the millions of Americans who don’t make it till death does part them. More than 40% of marriage end in divorce, down from the high record of the 1980s hut hardly a statistic for celebration. The most decisive aspect has long centered on the harm inflicted on children-irreparable damage, some researchers contend.
Hetherington, a University of Virginia professor, believes she offers "a more hopeful look, a more realistic look" at the consequences. She says the hook, authored with New York writer John Kelly, is neither anti-marriage (though angry e-mails already are accusing her of such) nor pro-divorce. Rather, it explains the challenges people face and the diverse choices they make. It doesn’t ignore the downside. While most children adapt and adjust to their parents’ split, she says, 20% to 25% are left deeply scarred.
"I harbour no doubts about the ability of divorce to devastate," she writes. "It can and does ruin lives. But that, I also think much current writing on divorce--both popular and academic--has exaggerated its negative effects and ignored its sometimes considerable positive effects."
After three decades exploring the most important nexus of human relations, through the stability or dissolution of nearly 1,400 marriages, she wishes others weren’t so skeptical, "Why are people so afraid to say that in the long run, people end up living reasonable constructive lives?"
Hetherington officially retired three years ago. The emeritus title relieved the 80-hour weeks she’d maintained at the university since her sons were little. She continues to write scholarly article, rising at 4 a.m. to begin work in her study--in Longhand, on yellow legal pads--and still lectures internationally.
Hetherington knows that recasting the way America thinks about divorce won’t be easy or politically popular. The pendulum swung far right during the 1990’s, with lawmakers debating, and. sometimes passing, measures to encourage couples to-stay married and prevent them from divorcing too quickly. "It’s very hard to legislate family relations," Hetherington says, as dubious now as then. "If we could legislate family relations, we wouldn’t have people getting married with these unrealistic expectations about marriage."
Far better to understand the dynamics that sustain and threaten families. Far better, she writes, to accept that "divorce is a reasonable solution to an unhappy, acrimonious, destructive marital relationship." Instead of a narrow focus on the hazards, why not acknowledge that it can be an opportunity to build a better life?
"It isn’t a matter of whether the glass is half empty or half full. In the long run," she concludes, "the glass is three-quarters full of reasonably happy and competent adults and children, who have been resilient in coping with the challenges of divorce." [br] It is implied by "The pendulum swung far right during the 1990’s..."that______.
选项
A、it was no easy task to change what Americans thought about divorce in the 1990’s
B、parents in the 1990’s would think twice before they got divorced
C、people were discouraged to get divorced by the 1990’s law
D、people could resort to law to regulate family relations
答案
C
解析
该句后面的with短语解释了该句的意思,即立法者总在争论,甚至有时通过一些举措来鼓励夫妻维持婚姻,制止他们草率地离婚。也就是说20世纪90年代的法律不鼓励人们离婚。因此应选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3280385.html
相关试题推荐
Atbeginningofthe2ndworldwar,Britaintookthepolicyof______A、appeasement
AuthorEmmaHeathcote-Jameshasspentnineyearslookingintoreal-lifeghost
AuthorEmmaHeathcote-Jameshasspentnineyearslookingintoreal-lifeghost
AuthorEmmaHeathcote-Jameshasspentnineyearslookingintoreal-lifeghost
ThebeginningofwhatwastobecometheUnitedStateswascharacterizedbyin
ThebeginningofwhatwastobecometheUnitedStateswascharacterizedbyin
[originaltext]AndPresidentBushsaystheUnitedStatesislookingintorepo
[originaltext]AndPresidentBushsaystheUnitedStatesislookingintorepo
LibraryLookingupmaterialforaresearchpaperinal
LibraryLookingupmaterialforaresearchpaperinal
随机试题
Readthememoandcoursebelow.Completetheformbelow.Writeawordorphrase(
Arapidmeansoflong-distancetransportationbecameanecessityfortheUni
A.interactionB.experiencedC.reflectD.responseE.undertakenF.affectG.
A.heightB.compensateC.whereasD.imbibeE.reflectF.degreeG.strategyH.
患者男,31岁。火药灼伤11小时。查体:P140次/分,BP134/50mmHg
腰间盘突出症,出现排尿困难,鞍区麻木,是因为()A.马尾神经受压 B.
围生期指A、妊娠满28周至产后1周 B、妊娠满30周至产后1周 C、妊娠
Thechangeinthatvillagewasmiraculou
(2016年11月)简述企业培训需求分析在任务分析阶段的工作步骤。(15分)
决定牙齿形态的重要的结构是A.成釉器 B.牙囊 C.牙乳头 D.缩余釉上皮
最新回复
(
0
)