首页
登录
职称英语
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Ric
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Ric
游客
2023-12-16
24
管理
问题
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor, credits the world’s economics and social progress over the last thousand years to "Western civilization and its dissemination." The reason, he believes, is that Europeans invented systematic economic development. Landes adds that two unique aspects of Europeans culture were crucial ingredient in EUrope’s economic growth.
First, Landes espouses a generalized form of Max Weber’s thesis that the values of work, initiative, and investment made the difference for Europe. Despite his emphasis on science, Landes does not stress the notion of rationality as such. In his view, "what counts is work, thrift, honesty, patience, tenacity." The only route to economic success for individuals or states is working hard, spending less than you earn, and investing the rest in productive capacity. This is the fundamental explanation of the problem posed by his book’s subtitle: "Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor." For historical reasons—an emphasis on private property, an experience of political pluralism, a temperate climate, an urban style—Europeans have, on balance, followed those practices and therefore have prospered.
Second, and perhaps most important, Europeans were learners. They "learned rather greedily," as Joel Mokyr put it in a review of Landes’s book. Even if Europeans possessed indigenous technologies that gave them an advantage (spectacles, for example), as Landes believes they did, their most vital asset was the ability to assimilate knowledge from around the world and put it to use—as in borrowing the concept of zero and rediscovering Aristotle’s Logic from the Arabs and taking paper and gunpowder from the Chinese via the Muslim world. Landes argues that a systematic resistance to learning from other cultures had become the greatest handicap of the Chinese by the eighteenth century and remains the greatest handicap of Arab countries today.
Although his analysis of Europeans expansion is almost nonexistent, Landes does not argue that Europeans were beneficent bearers of civilization to a benighted world. Rather, he relies on his own commonsense law: "When one group is strong enough to push another around and stands to gain by it, it will do so." In contrast to the new school of world historians, Landes believes that specific cultural values enabled technological advances that in turn made some Europeans strong enough to dominate people in other parts of the world. Europeans therefore proceeded to do so with great viciousness and cruelty. By focusing on their victimization in this process, Landes holds, some postcolonial states have wasted energy that could have been put into productive work and investment. If one could sum up Landes’s advice to these states in one sentence, it might be "Stop whining and get to work." This is particularly important, indeed hopeful, advice, he would argue, because success is not permanent. Advantages are not fixed, gains from trade are unequal, and different societies react differently to market signals. Therefore, not only is there hope for undeveloped countries, but developed countries have little cause to be complacent, because the current situation "will press hard" on them.
The thrust of studies like Landes’s is to identify those distinctive features of European civilization that lie behind Europe’s rise to power and the creation of modernity more generally. Other historians have placed a greater emphasis on such features as liberty, individualism, and Christianity. In a review essay, the art historian Craig Clunas listed some of the less well known linkages that have been proposed between Western culture and modernity, including the propensities to think quantitatively, enjoy pornography, and consume sugar. All such proposals assume the fundamental aptness of the question: What elements of Europeans civilization led to European success? It is a short leap from this assumption to outright triumphalism. The paradigmatic book of this school is, of course, The End of History and the Last Man, in which Francis Fukuyama argues that after the collapse of Nazism in the twentieth century, the only remaining model for human organization in the industrial and communications ages is a combination of market economics and limited, pluralist, democratic government. [br] In discussing Landes’s work, the author’s tone is
选项
A、enthusiastic.
B、skeptical.
C、reproachful.
D、matter-of-fact.
答案
D
解析
态度题。在对Landes的作品进行介绍时,作者使用了诸如he believes,Landes adds,Landes bclieves Landes argues,Landes holds等客观引述的结构,全文沦述没有夹带作者自己的观点,未就 Landes的观点和作品进行任何评论,因此为客观引述,故D为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3278905.html
相关试题推荐
DavidLandes,authorofTheWealthandPovertyofNations:WhySomeAreSoRi
DavidLandes,authorofTheWealthandPovertyofNations:WhySomeAreSoRi
DavidLandes,authorofTheWealthandPovertyofNations:WhySomeAreSoRi
Mostdoctorsinarecentsurveysaidthatannualphysicalexaminationswere
Mostdoctorsinarecentsurveysaidthatannualphysicalexaminationswere
Mostdoctorsinarecentsurveysaidthatannualphysicalexaminationswere
Mostdoctorsinarecentsurveysaidthatannualphysicalexaminationswere
Mostdoctorsinarecentsurveysaidthatannualphysicalexaminationswere
GoingForth,TheNationsMultiplyUnevenlyDespitewars,famines,andepid
GoingForth,TheNationsMultiplyUnevenlyDespitewars,famines,andepid
随机试题
对于轻质隔墙泰柏板的下列描述中哪条有误?( )A.厚度薄,自重轻,强度高 B
试戴铸造全冠时,冠完全就位后,出现哪种状况可不必重做A.边缘过短,未到达固位要求
生产经营性项目投产后,用于购买原材料、燃料、支付工资及其他经营费用等所需的周转资
在技巧练习中依次经臀、腰、背、肩、头滚动的动作是( )A.前滚翻 B.后滚翻
人才的特征包括()A、社会性 B、进步性 C、相对性 D、创造性
下列不属于有限责任公司高级管理人员的是()。A.经理 B.董事会秘书 C.
初孕妇,25岁,妊娠30+4周,定期产检。常规的人工监测方法不包括A.称体重
小强是小学四年级学生。在学校经常欺负同学,小强知道这样做不对, 但遇事时管不住
商业银行内部监督部门应向()提供独立的综合理财业务风险管理评估报告。A.董事会
宏观经济调控中需要关注的重点是()。A.季节性失业 B.摩擦性失业 C.周
最新回复
(
0
)