首页
登录
职称英语
Critics and supporters of the United Nations have sometimes seen worlds apart.
Critics and supporters of the United Nations have sometimes seen worlds apart.
游客
2023-12-16
54
管理
问题
Critics and supporters of the United Nations have sometimes seen worlds apart. But since last year, almost all of them, whether multilateralist or unilateralist, American or European, have come to agree that the organization is in crisis. This week, a blue ribbon panel commissioned by the body’s secretary-general, Kofi Annan, released its report on what to do about it.
The U. N. ’s sorry state became most obvious with the Iraq war. Those favoring the war were furious that after a decade of Security Council resolutions, including the last-chance Resolution 1441 threatening "serious consequences" if Iraq did not prove its disarmament, the U. N. could not agree to act. Anti-war types were just as frustrated that the world body failed to stop the war. But Iraq was not the U. N.’s only problem. It has done little to stop humanitarian disasters, such as the ongoing horror in Sudan. And it has done nothing to stop Iran’s and North Korea’s pursuit of nuclear weapons.
Recognizing the danger of irrelevance, Mr. Annan last year told a 16-member panel, composed mainly of former government ministers and heads of government, to suggest changes. These fall broadly into two categories: the institutional and the cultural. The former has got most of the headlines -- particularly a call for changing the structure of the Security Council. But changes in the U. N. ’s working practices are crucial too.
Everyone agrees that the Security Council is an unrepresentative relic: of its 15 seats, five are occupied by permanent, veto-wielding members (America, Russia, China, Britain and France) and ten go to countries that rotate every two years and have no veto. But that the council’s composition is a throwback to the world order immediately after the Second World War has been agreed on for decades, without any success in changing it. Japan and Germany, the secondand thirdbiggest contributors to the U.N. budget, believe they are entitled to permanent seats. So does India, the world’s second-most- populous country, and Brazil, Latin America’s biggest. Unlike in previous efforts, these four have finally banded together to press their case. And they are joined in spirit by the Africans, who want two seats for their continent.
But each aspirant has opponents. Italy opposes a permanent seat for Germany, which would make Italy the only biggish European power. It instead proposes a single seat for the European Union, a non- starter since this would require Britain and France to give up theirs, and regional institutions cannot be U.N. members under the current U.N. Charter. Spanish-speaking Mexico and Argentina do not think Portuguese-speaking Brazil should represent Latin America, and Pakistan strongly opposes its rival India’s bid. As for potential African seats, Egypt claims one as the representative of the Muslim and Arab world. That would leave Nigeria, the continent’s most populous country, and South Africa, which is richer and a more stable democracy, fighting for the other.
The panel has proposed two alternatives. The first would give six countries ( none is named but probably Germany, Japan, India, Brazil and two African countries) permanent seats without a veto, and create three extra non-permanent seats, bringing the total number of council members to 24. The second, which would expand the council by the same number of seats, creates a new middle tier of members who would serve for four years and could be immediately re-elected, above the current lower tier of two-year members, who cannot be re-elected. The rivals to the would-be permanent members favor this option.
While Security Council reform may be the most visible of the proposals, the panel has also shared its views on the guidelines on when members may use force legally, tinder the U. N. Charter, they can do so in two circumstances only: Article 51 allows force in a clear case of self-defense, and Chapter Ⅶ permits its use when the Security Council agrees. While the panelists have not proposed major changes to these two parts of the Charter, they have offered refinements.
Though the Charter was written to govern war between countries, the panel argues that even without revision, Chapter Ⅶ lets the Security Council authorize force for more controversial, modem reasons like fighting terrorists and intervention in states committing humanitarian horrors. It even considers "preventive" wars against serious but non-imminent threats potentially justifiable.
But the panel also says any decision to use force must pass five tests: the threat must be grave; the primary purpose must be to avert the threat; force must be a last resort; means must be proportional; and there must be a reasonable chance that force will succeed without calamitous consequences. All common-sense stuff, but the panel proposes making these tests explicit (if subjective and unofficial), thus raising the quality of debate about any decision to go to war.
On top of this, the report urges the U.N. to make better use of its assets in the fight against terrorism. One of the obstacles to an effective counter-terrorism strategy has been U.N. members’ inability to agree on a definition of terrorism. The panel tries to help by defining it as "any action that is intended to cause death or serious bodily harm to civilians or non-combatants"; Arab countries may continue to press for exemptions in the case of "foreign occupation". The report also deals with what it sees as a possible "cascade of nuclear proliferation" in the near future. It recommends creating more incentives for countries to stop enriching uranium. [br] What’s the main topic of the passage?
选项
A、The current crisis of the U. N.
B、Suggestion on changes in working practices of file U. N.
C、Improvement in the efficiency of the U. N.
D、The U. N. in the Iraq war.
答案
B
解析
主旨题。文章自始至终都是针对联合国现有问题提出的改革建议,可见B正确。文章重点在如何解决问题而不在分析问题,故排除A;C原文中并没有提到;D只在原文第二段和结尾部分提到,属于细节而非主旨。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3278510.html
相关试题推荐
TheUnitedStateshasamajorracialproblemonitshands.True,Britainisf
Mostdoctorsinarecentsurveysaidthatannualphysicalexaminationswere
Mostdoctorsinarecentsurveysaidthatannualphysicalexaminationswere
Mostdoctorsinarecentsurveysaidthatannualphysicalexaminationswere
Mostdoctorsinarecentsurveysaidthatannualphysicalexaminationswere
Mostdoctorsinarecentsurveysaidthatannualphysicalexaminationswere
Mostdoctorsinarecentsurveysaidthatannualphysicalexaminationswere
Mostdoctorsinarecentsurveysaidthatannualphysicalexaminationswere
GoingForth,TheNationsMultiplyUnevenlyDespitewars,famines,andepid
GoingForth,TheNationsMultiplyUnevenlyDespitewars,famines,andepid
随机试题
应与原发性浆细胞白血病进行鉴别的是A:急性早幼粒细胞白血病B:慢性粒细胞白血病
共用题干 SchoolLunchResearchhasshowntha
英国的心理学家对一个占星学院中3000多名大学生进行性格测试,发现受访者性格竟然
女性,28岁。21岁时因心慌、怕热、多汗、消瘦就诊,确诊Graves病,他巴唑规
关于知识和能力的关系,正确的观点是()。 A.知识越多,能力越强 B.能力
首席风险官发现期货公司经营管理行为的合法合规性、风险管理等方面存在的违法违规问题
李某原在甲公司就职,适用不定时工作制。2012年1月,因甲公司被乙公司兼并,李某
根据交通部《公路工程施工分包管理办法》规定,下列专业分包的说法中,错误的有( )
关于高路堤施工技术的说法,错误的是()。A.高路堤段应优先安排施工,宜预留1
有关锅炉安装许可说法,错误的是()。A.安装单位必须取得《特种设备安装改造维修
最新回复
(
0
)