首页
登录
职称英语
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very
游客
2023-12-15
34
管理
问题
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first explosion was detonated. Hearing the sirens and seeing London’s emergency personnel respond to the bombings brought back vivid memories of the events of Sept. 11, 2001.
People have not forgotten Sept. 11, 2001. Americans can still recall exactly where they were and what they were doing on that fateful day. But it’s understandable that some remember it as historical fact, lacking the painful impact and immediacy they originally felt. If we allow a dimming of purpose—to eliminate terrorism—these terrorist attacks in London serve as another chilling reminder that we’re still at war.
Something constructive emerges from these tragic, horrible and unexplainable attacks. It is the message that we must remain vigilant in opposing an enemy who intentionally targets innocent civilians.
Since Sept. 11, 2001, the civilized nations of the world have remained mostly united in opposing these despicable, wanton acts of terror. We have had some great successes in that effort. We have arrested perpetrators and plotters, and we have foiled planned attacks. We have reduced the power and scope of those who despise freedom and democracy.
The effort must continue. As we learned Thursday—and in Madrid and Bali—the enemies of freedom have not lost their resolve. We must not lose ours.
Ultimately, the only real defense from terrorist attacks is being able to find out about them in advance. Intelligence gathering has improved but needs to be even stronger, including consistently improving human intelligence and patrol. Police and ordinary citizens must be alert and encouraged to convey information.
Once a terrorist incident does occur, there’s no such thing as a perfect response. By definition, a terrorist attack means people are being hurt or killed. But by studying the response to past attacks, we can better prepare to handle those in the future.
London is one of the most secure cities in the world, steeped in years of dealing with terrorism. The city’s preparation and resolve was evident on Thursday. I am very impressed by London’s reaction to the bombings. Both the emergency personnel and the citizens seemed prepared. The first responders were rapid, well-directed, organized and professional, in accordance with obviously well-tested plans.
As for the citizens, at least a dozen people told me in one way or another, "We knew this was going to happen; it was just a question of when."
That is not only a realistic assessment; it also is a mindset that just might save lives. Political, business and community leaders are sometimes reluctant to talk about terrorism or stage drills to prepare their response because they don’t want to frighten or upset people. But that’s a mistake. People react to emergencies more effectively when they’re not shocked by them.
Tony Blair and London Mayor Ken Livingstone have made preparedness a priority, and their efforts clearly paid off during Thursday’s response to the attacks.
There’s another benefit to preparing for terrorism in advance. Part of the damage the terrorists hope to inflict is the emotional reaction in the wake of the destruction. The reason it’s called’ "terrorism" is that they want fear and its debilitating effects to linger long after the smoke has cleared.
By preparing citizens for the possibility of a terrorist attack, leaders can help minimize the emotional response in the wake of the destruction.
Finally, Thursday’s attacks demonstrate that we must remain committed to confronting and eliminating terrorism. There are those who assert that the efforts to eliminate terror are somehow provoking the terrorists. That is wrong. The terrorists have been attacking innocent people long before Sept. 11, 2001, or the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq.
Seeing Prime Minister Blair speak so forcefully, with President Bush, President Jacques Chirac and other world leaders right behind him; was encouraging. Let’s remember the unity the world shared after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Free nations can and will disagree. But let us always remember that free people must be steadfast and resilient in defending our way of life. [br] A suitable rifle for the passage would be
选项
A、July 7th Terrorist Attack in London.
B、The war against terrorism.
C、Terrorism after Sept.11, 2001.
D、Lessons from terrorist attack in London.
答案
D
解析
本文作者从伦敦恐怖袭击开始写起,接着回顾“9.11"恐怖事件,提醒人们恐怖主义分子依然猖狂,随后用大量篇幅阐述伦敦应对此次事件给我们的经验和教训,最后作者呼吁全世界的自由民族联合起来抵抗恐怖主义。全文章体是对伦敦7月7日恐怖袭击的反思和经验总结,因此选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3276832.html
相关试题推荐
Havingsaidallofthis,Ishould,perhaps,locatemyself.Iteachandwritea
Shestartedinthebathroom.Sheputtheshavingbrush,thedisposablerazor,
OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotelvery
OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotelvery
OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotelvery
OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotelvery
OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotelvery
Nowadaysmoreandmorepeoplespendtheirleisuretimetraveling,havingsigh
Theofficialresidenceofthe______isatnumber10DowningStreet,London.A、Br
Infact,today’steenagersaremisbehavingalotlessthanhisparentsdid.his——
随机试题
Youshouldspendabout20minutesonQuestions1—13,whicharebasedonReading
[originaltext]Interviewer:Hello,everyone.WelcometoourprogrammeWorldlyWi
男性青春期性发育的第一个信号A.喉结出现 B.睾丸的增大 C.身高生长突增
在考虑是否将现有的内部审计资源从正在进行的遵循性审计转向管理当局要求的某分部审计
关于原油集输站、集输管道防火、防爆的基本要求,下列说法中,不正确的是()。A.
患者,男性,67岁,渐进性劳累后呼吸困难5年,加重伴双下肢水肿半月入院。患者5年
甲公司与某事业单位共同使用一栋共有土地使用权的髙层建筑物。该建筑物占用土地面积5
在地震多发地区,建筑物钢筋混凝土楼板通常采用()的施工方式。(2008年真题
艾滋病最常见的恶性肿瘤是A.鳞状细胞癌 B.腺癌 C.恶性淋巴瘤 D.K
下列不属于商用房贷款签约与发放环节的主要风险点的是()。A.合同凭证预签无效、
最新回复
(
0
)