首页
登录
职称英语
Many Americans-perhaps most of them-aren’t ready for President Bush’s "owners
Many Americans-perhaps most of them-aren’t ready for President Bush’s "owners
游客
2023-12-15
60
管理
问题
Many Americans-perhaps most of them-aren’t ready for President Bush’s "ownership society". The idea sounds good. Employees could shift a portion of what they pay into Social Security and put it into individual accounts that might gain higher returns in, say, the stock market.
They could also reduce their tax bill by starting Health Savings Accounts, Retirement Savings Accounts, and Lifetime Savings Accounts.
These options reflect a certain conservative logic. Rather than having the government or your company decide how much retirement money or healthcare you get, you can decide for yourself.
"If you own something, you have a vital stake in the future of our country," Mr. Bush explains.
"The more ownership there is in America, the more vitality there is in America."
The flaw in this logic is Americans lack of financial sophistication. For example: Less than one-quarter of working-age people characterize themselves as "knowledgeable investors," according to surveys by John Hancock Financial Services. Even this minority shows "considerable confusion". For example: Many surveyed thought money-market funds included stocks and bonds.
That doesn’t mean Americans are stupid. They just have better things to do. "Many people don’t have the time, inclination, or expertise necessary to take full responsibility for their own well-being in areas that are so complex as assuring they have sufficient income for retirement or choosing a health plan appropriate for their circumstances", says Robert Reischauer, president of the Urban Institute, a Washington think tank.
Moreover, many Americans would have trouble reading the documents involved in such decisions. Some 44 million adults at the lowest of five levels of literacy were unable to decipher simple texts and documents, according to a decade-old survey by the Department of Education. Even the larger number of people at the next level of literacy would find financial reports and documents difficult.
Because it goes to the heart of the liberal-conservative divide over the role of government, the ownership society sparks political controversy.
"Boneheaded, wacky, breathtakingly threatening," writes Greg Palast for AlterNet, a liberal website set up by the Independent Media Institute. It’s "lopping off a chunk of Social Security insurance revenue for gambling in the stock market."
On the conservative side: The ownership society "tends to encourage self-esteem and healthy habits of behavior, such as acting more for the long term, or taking education more seriously," argues David Boaz of the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank in Washington.
But judgment doesn’t need to rely on rhetoric. The United States already has experimented with transferring the major responsibility for retirement savings from employers to employees. It’s the 401(k) plan, which got going in the 1980s.
Workers are "overwhelmed" by them, argues Boston College’s Alicia Munnell, who with Annika Sunde wrote a new book, "Coming Up Short," on these popular retirement plans. For example:
Only 25 percent of eligible workers join the plan. (The Bush private accounts will be voluntary for younger workers.)
Ninety percent of those participating contribute less than the maximum.
Almost 60 percent of participants have undiversified portfolios, with almost all their money in stocks, or in bonds and other fixed-income investments. About 20 percent of 401 (k) assets are invested in the stock of the company employing the workers-risky indeed, as Enron employees found out.
Hardly any participants take time to rebalance their portfolios as they age or the market changes. About 55 percent of them cash out their accumulated funds when they leave a job, instead of saving the money for retirement.
The result is that those currently approaching retirement (aged 55 to 64) have, on average, about $50,000 in their 401(k) plans. That’s only enough to generate $300 a month-little to top up the $900 average Social Security payment. [br] Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
选项
A、A large portion of working-age people characterize themselves as "knowledgeable investors.
B、About a quarter of Americans find it difficult to read financial reports and documents.
C、There is political disagreement about the "ownership society".
D、The author seems to feel optimistic about this plan.
答案
C
解析
根据本文,下面哪个叙述是真实的?全篇文章讨论的是这一计划可能存在的一些问题,所以引发了分歧。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3275425.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]RussianPresidentVladimirPutinwelcomesChinesePresidentHu
[originaltext]PresidentBushhasstronglydenouncedphotosshowingthehumili
______istheAmericanpresidentduringTheGreatDePressionwhoproposedNewDe
WhowastheUSPresidentduringWorldWarⅡ?A、DwightD.EisenhowerB、JohnF.Kenn
[originaltext]PresidentBushsaysAmericaneedstofocusonresearchanddeve
[originaltext]TheFrenchPresidentJacqueChirachasorderedthereturntopo
In1932,AmericanPresidentFranklinD.Rooseveltpromiseda"______"togetAmer
[originaltext]FormerPresidentofRussiaYeltsin,whodiedofaheartattac
[originaltext]FormerPresidentofRussiaYeltsin,whodiedofaheartattac
[originaltext]Thefront-runnerinthepresidentialelectioninHaitiRenePreva
随机试题
•Readthearticlebelowaboutvideogames.•Choosethebestsentencefromthe
【B1】[br]【B13】A、placesB、occasionsC、surroundingsD、casesDinmostcases是固定短语,表
[originaltext]W:Mr.Hiller,isthenumberofcomplaintsincreasingordecreasi
如何编制区域卫生规划?
A.大量中性粒细胞,革兰染色阳性球菌 B.大量粒细胞,细菌很少 C.大量中性
中大夫东方朔撰文上书汉武帝,所用竹简需要两人抬进宫。以后改变这种携书不方便现象首
患者因腹胀,全身疼痛而就诊。检查:脾肋缘下6cm,血液白细胞计数160×109/
半高峰宽用于A.色谱定性分析B.色谱系统柱效的计算C.色谱定量分析D.色谱分离度
下列属于个人所得税专项附加扣除项目的有( )。A.子女教育 B.继续教育
甲施工企业将自己中标的一项工程全部分包给不具备相应资质的乙劳务企业,合同中规定了
最新回复
(
0
)