首页
登录
职称英语
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he
游客
2023-12-11
22
管理
问题
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he and his late collaborator, Amos Tversky, are often credited with showing that humans make "irrational" choices. That term is too strong, he says, to describe the variety of mental mishaps to which people systematically fall prey. Readers of his book may disagree. Mr. Kahneman, an Israeli-American psychologist and Nobel economics laureate, has delivered a full catalogue of the biases, shortcuts and cognitive illusions to which our species regularly succumbs. In doing so he makes it plain that Homo economicus the rational model of human behaviour beloved of economists—is as fantastical as a unicorn.
In one experiment described by Mr. Kahneman, participants asked to imagine that they have been given £50 behave differently depending on whether they are then told they can "keep" £20 or must "lose" £30--though the outcomes are identical. He also shows that it is more threatening to say that a disease kills "1,286 in every 10,000 people", than to say it kills "24. 14% of the population", even though the second mention is twice as deadly. Vivid language often overrides basic arithmetic.
Some findings are downright peculiar. Experimental subjects who have been "primed" to think of money, perhaps by seeing a picture of dollar bills, will act more selfishly. So if someone nearby drops some pencils, these subjects will pick up fewer than their non-primed counterparts. Even obliquely suggesting the concept of old age will inspire people to walk more slowly—though feeling elderly never crossed their mind, they will later report.
After all this the human brain looks less like a model of rationality and more like a giddy teenager; flighty, easily distracted and lacking in self-awareness. Yet this book is not a counsel of despair. Its awkward title refers to Mr. Kahneman’s two-tier model of cognition: "System 1" is quick, intuitive and responsible for the quirks and mistakes described above(and many others). "System 2", by contrast, is slow, deliberative and less prone to error. System 2 kicks in when we are faced with particularly complex problems, but much of the time it is all too happy to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.
What, then, is System 1 good for? Rather a lot, it turns out. In a world that often demands swift judgment and rapid decision-making, a creature who solely relied on deliberative thinking wouldn’t last long. Moreover, System 1 generally works well. As Mr. Kahneman says, "most of our judgments and actions are appropriate most of the time". He urges readers to counteract what he considers to be mistakes of System 1 thinking, such as the "loss aversion" that deters people from accepting favourable gambles(such as a 50-50 chance to win $200 or lose $100). He also recommends checking the performance of an investment portfolio no more than once a quarter, to limit needless anguish over short-term fluctuations and the "useless churning" of shares.
Mr. Kahneman does not dwell on the possible evolutionary origins of our cognitive biases, nor does he devote much time to considering why some people seem naturally better at avoiding error than others.
Still this book, his first for a non-specialist audience, is a profound one. As Copernicus removed the Earth from the centre of the universe and Darwin knocked humans off their biological perch, Mr. Kahneman has shown that we are not the paragons of reason we assume ourselves to be. Often hailed as the father of behavioural economics(with Tversky as co-parent), his work has influenced a range of disciplines and has even inspired some policy.
But the true consequences of his findings are only starting to emerge. When he presents the poor victims of his experiments with conclusive proof of their errors, the typical reaction is not a chastened pledge to shape up, but confused silence, followed by business as usual. No one likes to be told he is wrong. [br] The word "mishaps" in Paragraph 1 probably means
选项
A、problems.
B、dilemmas.
C、choices.
D、models.
答案
A
解析
语义题。由题干直接定位至首段第二句。接着第四句就Mr.Kahneman的新书内容做出说明,这里的our species regularly succumbs与which people systematically fall prey意思相同,可见mental mishaps包含biases,shortcuts,cognitive illusions等内容,而偏见、心理捷径以及认知幻想等都属于心理问题,因此[A]符合文意。根据第四句可以判断,biases,shortcuts,cognitive illusions属于心理问题范畴,与dilemma(两难困境)没有关联,排除[B];虽然首句提到“irrational”choices,但这里谈及的不是选择问题,排除[C];同理,末句提到了model,本句中的内容与模式也不相关,排除[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3262560.html
相关试题推荐
ThenovelGulliver’sTravelsiswrittenbyA、DanielDefoe.B、JonathanSwift.C、Fr
AccordingtoProfessorDanielePiomelli,humansdeveloped______.[br][original
AccordingtoProfessorDanielePiomelli,humansdeveloped______.[originaltext]
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
Janet’sattitudetowardstheAmericanizedstyleasamodelforbusinessnegotiat
[originaltext]A:Howdoyouandyourhousematesliketheco-up?I’mthinking
随机试题
进行试验路段的主要目的有()。A.确定压路机型号以及各种机械的使用最佳配合
下列哪种寄生虫属于共栖原虫A.肝吸虫 B.蛔虫 C.钩虫 D.疟原虫 E
按三级预防思想,“预防保护性行为”除了下列()A.日常促进健康的行为 B.保
某油浸变压器室,采用局部应用方式的开式细水雾灭火系统进行防护,保护对象周围的气流
在没有成立工会组织的企业中,集体合同由()代表职工与企业签订。A.职工代表
人格测验的方法与类型也是多种多样的,其方法主要有( )A.自陈量表法 B.心
甲公司确认本月办公楼租金60万元,其中银行存款支付10万元,另外50
银行承兑汇票的承兑银行,应当按照票面金额向出票人收取()的手续费。A:千分之一
传染病的病原学及免疫学检查方法不包括( )。A.病原体核酸检测 B.特异性抗
未经患者或者其家属同意,对患者进行实验性治疗的,由卫生行政部门给予的处理是()。
最新回复
(
0
)