首页
登录
职称英语
When the late Isaiah Berlin was knighted, a friend joked that the honour was
When the late Isaiah Berlin was knighted, a friend joked that the honour was
游客
2023-12-05
25
管理
问题
When the late Isaiah Berlin was knighted, a friend joked that the honour was for his services to conversation. The distinguished theorist of liberalism was indeed a brilliant talker and feline gossip. Readers of Berlin’s letters will find that same bubbling flow of malice, wit and human insight on the written page.
A first set of letters came out five years ago. To coincide with Berlin’s centenary year—he lived from 1909 to 1997—his literary executor, Henry Hardy, and a team of co-editors have now brought out a second fat volume. The verbal pressure is higher still, for in 1949 Berlin began dictating to a machine.
Biographically the letters take the reader through Berlin’s professional ascent from clever young don to Oxford professor, public educator and transatlantic academic star. They track the consolidation of his social position as an intellectual jewel of the post-war British establishment. Three or four footnotes a page introduce perhaps 1,000 or more politicians, public servants, academics, musicians and socialites whom Berlin knew or talked about. For that alone, his letters are a unique record of a bygone milieu.
Berlin did not write on oath. He ladles praise on correspondents only to dismiss them in letters to others as gorgons or third-raters. During the Suez crisis in 1956 he writes to the wife of the Prime Minister, Sir Anthony Eden, that her husband has shown "great moral splendour". The next letter, to Berlin’s stepson at Harvard, calls the British action "childish folly". His capsule judgments are sometimes apt, sometimes sneering. He calls Sir Peter Strawson, an eminent contemporary philosopher, provincial. Berlin is sharper still on his own thin-skinned self. He belittles his large philosophical gifts, finds publication an agony and worries to correspondents that his work is rot.
Mr. Hardy says that these letters represent perhaps a fourth of those Berlin wrote in 1946-1960. There are none back to him. So here is Berlin in his own ironical voice, as selected by editors. A reader only of these letters may well ask why Berlin had such grateful pupils and devoted friends. And why was he among the foremost liberal thinkers of the age? A selection of old and new tributes, The Book of Isaiah, also edited by the tireless Mr. Hardy, partly answers both questions.
Thinkers such as John Rawls defended liberal principles with more argument. Among historians of ideas, Quentin Skinner did more to professionalise their discipline. No one had Berlin’s gift for dramatising and personalising abstract ideas.
Berlin kept returning to three core convictions. Freedom from constraint by others(negative liberty)is more urgent or basic, he argued, than freedom to realise your potential(positive liberty). The left distrusted that distinction and the right misappropriated it, while philosophers continue to pick it over. He thought, secondly, that liberalism fails if it cannot validate the universal need to belong.
But perhaps Berlin’s strongest conviction was that the basic commitments—to friendship and truth, fairness and liberty, family and achievement, nation and principle—clash routinely and cannot be smoothly reconciled. Thinkers and politicians should admit the conflicts, Berlin implied, and not blanket them with doctrine or tyrannically attempt to subordinate some concerns to others.
The first two of those ideas crop up here and there in these letters. In personal form, that third conviction—that people are to be taken in full, not in formulae—runs throughout, and was surely one source of Berlin’s charm. More volumes of letters are to follow. Readers will wonder what self-mocking Berlin would have made of this growing monument. He was an erudite wit at the dinner table and, as the reader now sees, in his letters. But he was a thinker first, and for his thought there is no substitute for his essays. [br] The last paragraph implies that Berlin’s letters______.
选项
A、present a different image of Berlin
B、reflect conflicts among Berlin’s three convictions
C、are not the best source to learn Berlin’s thought
D、reveal flaws in Berlin’s philosophical theory
答案
C
解析
推断题。该段最后一句开头的“but”表示语义的转折,并强调伯林的首要角色是思想家,要研究学习他的思想,最好的依据是他的论文,他的书信是无法替代这一作用的,故[C]为正确答案。文章第一段表明伯林的信中体现了他的恶念、智趣与人性洞察力,但并未强调信件揭示出伯林形象的另一面,故排除[A];文中也未提及伯林的三个核心信念之间的矛盾,或者他的哲学学说中存在什么缺陷,故排除[B]和[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3245378.html
相关试题推荐
AreyourFacebookfriendsmoreinterestingthanthoseyouhaveinreallife?
AreyourFacebookfriendsmoreinterestingthanthoseyouhaveinreallife?
AreyourFacebookfriendsmoreinterestingthanthoseyouhaveinreallife?
ThethemeofThanksgivinghasalwaysbeenA、friendshipandhappiness.B、peaceand
WinstonChurchilloncemoanedaboutthelong,dishonourabletraditioninpol
WinstonChurchilloncemoanedaboutthelong,dishonourabletraditioninpol
WinstonChurchilloncemoanedaboutthelong,dishonourabletraditioninpol
ThethemeofThanksgivinghasalwaysbeen______A、friendshipandhappiness.B、pe
Thewaywespeaktoclosefriendsisoftennotthesameasthewaywespeaktos
AlfredTennysonwrotealamentnamed______forthedeathofhisfriendHallam.A
随机试题
[originaltext]VoiceOne:AbottlenosedolphinnamedMauiplaysacomputerg
[originaltext]M:Susan,doyouknowhowlongittakestoapplyforavisaforC
自然人的民事权利能力的特征包括( )。A.与民事主体人身不可分离 B.普遍性
以下属于社区卫生服务特点的是A.以病人为导向的服务 B.以老年人为导向的服务
剧场扩声系统中,扬声器的固定应安全可靠,水平角、( )应能在设计要求的范围内方便
灵敏度较高的脑脊液蛋白质定性检验方法是A.Ross-Jone试验B.Nonne-
故障分布服从指数分布的产品,其故障率为λ,当工作时间t=1/λ时,其可靠度等于(
关于社会工作专业守则,以下说法中表述最准确的是()。A.它是社会共同遵守的行为
关于机电产品国际招标评标专家的特殊要求,下列叙述不正确的是()A.经济技术专家
(2017年真题)甲公司生产销售乙产品,当月预算产量1200件,材料标准用量5千
最新回复
(
0
)