首页
登录
职称英语
In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart
In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart
游客
2023-12-04
23
管理
问题
In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of avoiding the danger of a" scientific hierarchy" would be to see to it that every member of the general public was, as far as possible, scientifically educated. At the same time, scientists should be brought out of their isolation and encouraged to take a greater part in politics and administration.
As a general statement, I think most of us would agree with this, but I notice that, as usual, Mr. Cook does not define science, and merely implies in passing that it means certain exact sciences whose experiments can be made under laboratory conditions. Thus, adult education tends "to neglect scientific studies in favor of literary, economic and social subjects", economics and sociology not being regarded as branches of science, apparently. This point is of great importance. For the word science is at present used in at least two meanings, but the whole question of scientific education is obscured by the current tendency to dodge from one meaning to the other.
Science is generally taken as meaning either(a)the exact sciences, such as chemistry, physics, etc. ,or(b)a method of thought which obtains verifiable results by reasoning logically from observed fact.
If you ask any scientist, or indeed almost any educated person, "What is science?" you are likely to get an answer approximating to(b). In everyday life, however, both in speaking and in writing, when people say"science"they mean(a). Science means something that happens in a laboratory: test-tubes, balances, Bunsen burners, microscopes. A biologist, an astronomer, perhaps a psychologist or a mathematician, is described as a"man of science" :no one would think of applying this term to a statesman, a poet, a journalist or even a philosopher. And those who tell us that the young must be scientifically educated mean, almost invariably, that they should be taught more about radioactivity, or the stars, or the physiology of their own bodies, rather than that they should be taught to think more exactly
This confusion of meaning, which is partly deliberate, has in it a great danger. Implied in the demand for more scientific education is the claim that if one has been scientifically trained one’s approach to all subjects will be more intelligent than if one had had no such training. A scientist’s political opinions, it is assumed, his opinions on sociological questions, on morals, on philosophy, perhaps even on the arts, will be more valuable than those of a layman. But a" scientist", as we have just seen, means in practice a specialist in one of the exact sciences. It follows that a chemist or physicist, as such, is politically more intelligent than a poet or a lawyer. And, in fact, there are already millions of people who do believe this.
But is it really true that a "scientist" ,in this narrower sense, is any likelier than other people to approach non-scientific problems in an objective way? There is not much reason for thinking so. Take one simple test—the ability to withstand nationalism. It is often loosely said that "Science is international", but in practice the scientific workers of all countries line up behind their own governments with fewer scruples than are felt by the writers and the artists. The German scientific community, as a whole, made no resistance to Hitler. There were plenty of gifted men to do the necessary research on such things as synthetic oil, jet planes, rocket projectiles and the atomic bomb.
On the other hand, what happened to German literature when the Nazis came to power? I believe no exhaustive lists have been published, but I imagine that the number of German scientists—Jew apart—who voluntarily exiled themselves or were persecuted by the regime was much smaller than the number of writers and journalists. More sinister than this, a number of German scientists swallowed the monstrosity of "racial science".
But does this mean that the general public should not be more scientifically educated? On the contrary! All it means is that scientific education for the masses will do little good, and probably a lot of harm, if it simply boils down to more physics, more chemistry, more biology, etc. to the detriment of literature and history. Its probable effect on the average human being would be to narrow the range of his thoughts and make him more than ever contemptuous of such knowledge as he did not possess; and his political reactions would probably be somewhat less intelligent than those of an illiterate peasant who retained a few historical memories and a fairly sound aesthetic sense.
Clearly, scientific education ought to mean the implanting of a rational, skeptical, experimental habit of mind. It ought to mean acquiring a method—a method that can be used on any problem that one meets—and not simply piling up a lot of facts. Put it in those words, and the apologist of scientific education will usually agree. Press him further, ask him to particularize, and somehow it always turns out that scientific education means more attention to the exact sciences, in other words—more facts. The idea that science means a way of looking at the world, and not simply a body of knowledge, is in practice strongly resisted. I think sheer professional jealousy is part of the reason for this. [br] The author contrasts German science with German literature to support his viewpoint that______.
选项
A、German literature has long been persecuted by the government
B、writers are the most disruptive force of a government
C、scientists are more inclined to support their governments than writers
D、German scientists should not be on the side of the racists
答案
C
解析
推断题。第六段第四句指出,人们常笼统地说“科学无国界”,但实际上,所有国家的科学工作者在追随本国政府方面比起作家和艺术家而言,顾忌更少。显然在随后两段中作者阐述德国科学家和艺术家的例子是为了说明上面的观点,故[C]为答案。虽然第七段中提到了德国文学家受到迫害,但这是支持观点的细节,而非观点,因此排除[A];[B]虽然属于观点,但不是作者在将德国科学家和文学家进行对比论述时支持的论点,故排除;同理可以排除[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3245312.html
相关试题推荐
Stewart’skeyinstructionalpointforhisreceiverswastokeeptheircoremuscl
Inwritingthepoem"TheRiver-Merchant’swife:Aletter",Poundtookitsmate
LosAngelescabinet-makerEdwardStewartmaybeamodernDr.Frankenstein.In
LosAngelescabinet-makerEdwardStewartmaybeamodernDr.Frankenstein.In
LosAngelescabinet-makerEdwardStewartmaybeamodernDr.Frankenstein.In
AreyourFacebookfriendsmoreinterestingthanthoseyouhaveinreallife?
AreyourFacebookfriendsmoreinterestingthanthoseyouhaveinreallife?
AreyourFacebookfriendsmoreinterestingthanthoseyouhaveinreallife?
______istheauthorofTheScarletLetter,anovelconcernedwiththelifeofPu
TheScarletLetteristhemasterpieceof______.A、NathanielHawthorneB、RalphWal
随机试题
PassageTwo(1)Scientist,engineer,musicianandgreatartist,Leonard
Itisimpossibletodescribeinsomnia(失眠)topeoplewhoaresoundsleepers.T
How’sthisforunintendedconsequences?Someofthebiggestbeneficiaries(受惠
针对工程风险的特殊性,工程保险可提供较全面的保障,这表明工程保险具有( )。A:
患者男,舌癌术后5年,术后曾行颈部及颌下区放疗,放射剂量不详,1个月前出现下颌牙
药材调剂工作的主要环节是A.审方B.计价C.调配D.复核E.发药
关于站用变例行巡视,说法正确的是()。原存在的设备缺陷是否有发展$;$气体
财政调节不同经济主体的收入水平,主要体现其()职能。A.资源配置 B.收入分配
下列关于信贷期限的说法,错误的是()。A.自营贷款的期限最长一般不得超过1
某研究者欲了解2007年某地成年男性的高血压患病情况,抽样调查了200名当地的成
最新回复
(
0
)