首页
登录
职称英语
Why the inductive and mathematical sciences, after their first rapid develo
Why the inductive and mathematical sciences, after their first rapid develo
游客
2023-11-23
58
管理
问题
Why the inductive and mathematical sciences, after their first rapid development at the culmination of Greek civilization, advanced so slowly for two thousand years--and why in the following two hundred years a knowledge of natural and mathematical science has accumulated, which so vastly exceeds all that was previously known that these sciences may be justly regarded as the products of our own times--are questions which have interested the modem philosopher not less than the objects with which these sciences are more immediately conversant. Was it the employment of a new method of re search, or in the exercise of greater virtue in the use of the old methods, that this singular modem phenomenon had its ori gin? Was the long period one of arrested development, and is the modem, eraone of normal growth? Or should we ascribe the characteristics of both periods to so-called historical accidents--to the influence of conjunctions in circumstances of which no explanation is possible, save in the omnipotence and wisdom of a guiding Providence?
The explanation which has become commonplace, that the ancients employed deduction chiefly in their scientific inquiries, while the modems employ induction, proves to be too narrow, and fails upon close examination to point with sufficient distinctness the contrast that is evident between ancient and modem scientific doctrines and inquiries. For all, knowledge is founded on observation, and proceeds from this by analysis and synthesis, b/induction and deduction, and if possible by verification, or by new appeals to observation under the guidance of deduction--by steps which are indeed corelative parts of one method; and the ancient sciences afford examples of every one of these methods, or parts of one method, which have been generalized from the examples of science.
A failure to employ or to employ adequately and one of these partial methods, an imperfection in the arts and resources of observation and experiment, carelessness in observation, neglect of relevant facts, vagueness and carelessness in reasoning, and the failure to draw the consequences of theory and test them by appeal to experiment and observation--there are the faults which cause all failures to ascertain truth, whether among the ancients or the modems; but this statement does not explain why the modern is possessed of a greater virtue, and by what means he attained his superiority. Much less does it explain the sudden growth of science in recent times.
The attempt to discover the explanation of this phenomenon in the antithesis of "facts" and "theories" or "facts" and "ideas"--in the neglect among the ancients of the former, and their too exclusive attention to the latter---proves also to be too narrow, as well as open to the charge of vagueness. For, in the first place, the antithesis is not complete. Facts and theories are not coordinate species. Theories, if true, are facts--a particular class of facts indeed, generally complex ones, but still facts. Facts, on the other hand, even in the narrowest signification of the word, if they be at all complex, and if a logical connection subsists between their constituents, have all the positive attributes of theories.
Nevertheless, this distinction, however inadequate it may be to explain the source of true method in science, is well founded, and connotes an important character in true method. A fact is proposition of which the verification by an appeal to the primary sources of our knowledge or to experience is direct and simple. A theory, on the other band, if true has all the characteristics of a fact, except that its verification is possible only by indirect, remotes, and difficult means. To convert theories into facts is to add simple verification, and the theory thus acquires the full characteristics of a fact. [br] According to the author; one possible reason for the growth of science during the days of the ancient Greeks and in modern times is ______.
选项
A、the similarity between the two periods
B、that it was an act of God
C、that both tried to develop the inductive method
D、due to the decline of the deductive method
答案
B
解析
B项意为“是上天的安排”,这是作家在用方法论等失败后得出的结论。(第1段最后一句话)A项意为“两个阶段的相似性”。C项意为“两者都试图应用归纳法”。D项意为“由于演绎法的衰落”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3212137.html
相关试题推荐
Theworld-renowneddirectorandactionactor_______thesymposiumonthedevelopm
Oneofthemostimportantsocialdevelopmentsthathelpedtomakepossible
Oneofthemostimportantsocialdevelopmentsthathelpedtomakepossible
Whytheinductiveandmathematicalsciences,aftertheirfirstrapiddevelo
Whytheinductiveandmathematicalsciences,aftertheirfirstrapiddevelo
Itisacuriousparadoxthatwethinkofthephysicalsciencesas"hard",
Itisacuriousparadoxthatwethinkofthephysicalsciencesas"hard",
Itisacuriousparadoxthatwethinkofthephysicalsciencesas"hard",
Afterathree-yearsurveyofthesocialandbehavioralsciences,acommitte
Acomputerisamachinedesignedtoperformworkmathematicallyandtostor
随机试题
WriteonANSWERSHEETTWOanoteofabout50~60wordsbasedonthefollowing
关于软件测试与软件开发的认识,不正确的是______。A.软件生命周期各个阶段都
依照《药品经营质量管理规范》,不符合药品零售企业药品陈列要求的情形有A.拆零药品
()是指商业银行向并购方或其子公司发放的,用于支付并购交易价款和费用的贷款。A.
慢性肺源性心脏病心肺功能失代偿病人以2L/min的氧流量吸氧,此时的吸氧浓度为(
颌下急性蜂窝织炎最严重的并发症是 A.化脓性海绵状静脉窦炎B.败血症C.纵
下列各项中,在确定利用以前审计获取的有关控制运行有效性的审计证据是否适当以及再次
工程监理企业在监理活动中既要维护建设单位利益,又不能损害施工单位合法权益,并依据
国际工程通用的合同标准文件对工程价款的支付做出了不同的规定,下列选项中说法正确
定额中周转材料消耗量指标的表示,应当用一次使用量和摊销量两个指标表示。一次使用量
最新回复
(
0
)