首页
登录
职称英语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a
游客
2023-11-23
19
管理
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchman acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads— against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness toward individuals. [br] Which of the following is NOT true in Farwell’s case?
选项
A、Farwell was injured because he negligently ran his engine off the track.
B、Farwell would not have been injured if the switchman had been more careful.
C、The court argued that the victim had accepted the risk since he had willingly taken his job.
D、The court decided that the railroad should not be held responsible.
答案
A
解析
根据提示词“Farewell’s case”可在文章第三段找到相关信息。与原文比较可知,B、 C、D三项均符合文意;而A项所讲到的事故原因是错误的,事故是由于一个扳道工的过失造成的,而不是受害者自己。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3211233.html
相关试题推荐
PASSAGETHEREE[br]Whatopinionofthe19th-centuryphysiognomistsandphrenolo
Duringtheearlyyearsofthiscentury,wheatwasseenastheverylifeblood
Duringtheearlyyearsofthiscentury,wheatwasseenastheverylifeblood
Duringtheearlyyearsofthiscentury,wheatwasseenastheverylifeblood
Working-classfamiliesintheUnitedStatesareusuallynuclear,andmanystu
Working-classfamiliesintheUnitedStatesareusuallynuclear,andmanystu
Working-classfamiliesintheUnitedStatesareusuallynuclear,andmanystu
Working-classfamiliesintheUnitedStatesareusuallynuclear,andmanystu
Working-classfamiliesintheUnitedStatesareusuallynuclear,andmanystu
Working-classfamiliesintheUnitedStatesareusuallynuclear,andmanystu
随机试题
法洛三联症为A.房间隔缺损,左心室肥厚,肺动脉狭窄 B.房间隔缺损,室间隔缺损
1940年12月23日,重庆《大公报》报道:“中央大学艺术科教授张书旗为庆祝美国
显著性检验方法中的t检验方法,其原假设和备择假设分别是( )。
下列关于劳逸损伤与疾病发生关系的叙述,错误的是( )。A.久视伤血 B.久坐
A.风化 B.泛油 C.潮解 D.粘连 E.腐烂乳香在贮藏过程中最容易发
某健康妇女,进行查体,其骨盆型态各径线均属于正常人的平均值。 其中骨盆平面前
已知2008年的元旦是星期二,问2009年的元旦是星期几?()A.星期二
患者,男性,47岁,2年前曾接受肾移植手术,术后口服环孢素,全口牙龈增生覆盖牙冠
经济体制改革必须以()为重点,实现产权有效激励、要素自由流动、价格反应灵
根据《建设工程质量管理条例》,关于质量保修期限的说法,正确的有( )。A.地基基
最新回复
(
0
)