首页
登录
职称英语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
游客
2023-10-22
61
管理
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness (无情) toward individuals. [br] What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3121428.html
相关试题推荐
ItiscommonlybelievedthatintheUnitedStatesschooliswherepeoplegetan
ItiscommonlybelievedthatintheUnitedStatesschooliswherepeoplegetan
ItiscommonlybelievedthatintheUnitedStatesschooliswherepeoplegetan
ItiscommonlybelievedthatintheUnitedStatesschooliswherepeoplegetan
ItiscommonlybelievedthatintheUnitedStatesschooliswherepeoplegetan
ItiscommonlybelievedthatintheUnitedStatesschooliswherepeoplegetan
In1972,acenturyafterthefirstnationalparkintheUnitedStateswasestabl
In1972,acenturyafterthefirstnationalparkintheUnitedStateswasestabl
In1972,acenturyafterthefirstnationalparkintheUnitedStateswasestabl
In1972,acenturyafterthefirstnationalparkintheUnitedStateswasestabl
随机试题
CaradocClothing(Manufacturing)Ltd
[originaltext]M:Well,inanidealworld,Iguesswewouldallgetalongwitho
Mostpeopleareawarethatoutdoorairpollutioncandamagetheirhealth,bu
()不是连杆轴承异响的特征。A.温度升高,声音变化不大 B.随发动机转速增加
股权投资基金信息披露义务人向投资者进行()等事项,应当在基金合同中进行约定。
确诊慢性粒细胞白血病,最有意义的依据是A.嗜酸性粒细胞和嗜碱性粒细胞明显增高
2017年,我国发明专利申请量为138.2万件,同比增长14.2%。共授权发明专
独白言语属于A.对话言语 B.书面言语 C.外部言语 D.内部言语
()是通信网和有线电视网相结合的产物。A.HFC B.HDSL C.ADSL
三凹征是指A、呼气时,胸骨上窝、锁骨上窝和肋间隙明显凹陷 B、吸气时,呼吸肌用
最新回复
(
0
)