首页
登录
职称英语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
游客
2023-10-22
64
管理
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness (无情) toward individuals. [br] What must have happened after the fire case was settled in court?
选项
A、The railroad compensated for the damage to the immediate buildings.
B、The railroad compensated for all the damage by the fire.
C、The railroad paid nothing for the damaged building.
D、The railroad worker paid for the property damage himself.
答案
A
解析
原文第4段倒数第2句说“法庭推翻了陪审团要求全部赔偿的裁决,因为法庭认为铁路仅仅是造成就近建筑损坏的直接原因”。由此可以推断,铁路公司只对毗邻建筑的损失进行了赔偿,因此A符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3121426.html
相关试题推荐
ItiscommonlybelievedthatintheUnitedStatesschooliswherepeoplegetan
ItiscommonlybelievedthatintheUnitedStatesschooliswherepeoplegetan
ItiscommonlybelievedthatintheUnitedStatesschooliswherepeoplegetan
ItiscommonlybelievedthatintheUnitedStatesschooliswherepeoplegetan
ItiscommonlybelievedthatintheUnitedStatesschooliswherepeoplegetan
ItiscommonlybelievedthatintheUnitedStatesschooliswherepeoplegetan
In1972,acenturyafterthefirstnationalparkintheUnitedStateswasestabl
In1972,acenturyafterthefirstnationalparkintheUnitedStateswasestabl
In1972,acenturyafterthefirstnationalparkintheUnitedStateswasestabl
In1972,acenturyafterthefirstnationalparkintheUnitedStateswasestabl
随机试题
Accordingtothe"hygienehypothesis,"firstproposedin1989,exposuretoa
DearSirs:Thankyouforyourletterof20January2004.Wearedisappointed
在对国外市场预测分析时,主要产品的市场供应现状应说明项目设定的主要产品近( )年
磨牙支托的宽度应为磨牙面颊舌径的()A.3/5 B.2/3 C.
Iamoneofthemanycitypeoplewhoare
共用题干 Nurse!IWantMyMummyWhenachild
学习的内部动机和外部动机有什么关系?
关于组织内部供给预测中使用的人员调配图的陈述,正确的是()。A.它依据的是组织
银行承兑汇票的承兑银行,应当按照票面金额向出票人收取()的手续费。A:千分之一
下列哪项属于组织的损伤性改变A.萎缩 B.变性 C.肥大 D.增生 E.
最新回复
(
0
)