首页
登录
职称英语
In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fighters. We’re push
In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fighters. We’re push
游客
2023-09-17
32
管理
问题
In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fighters. We’re pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT prep courses and build resumes so they can get into the college of our first choice. We say our motives are selfless and sensible. A degree from Stanford or Princeton is the ticket for life. If Aaron and Nicole don’t get in, they’re forever doomed.
I’ve twice been to the wars, and as I survey the battlefield, something different is happening. It’s one-upmanship(能超越别人的本事) among parents. We see our kids’ college pedigrees(门第,出身) as trophies attesting to how well—or how poorly—we’ve raised them. But we can’t acknowledge that our obsession is more about us than them.
It’s true that getting into college has generally become tougher because the number of high-school graduates has grown. We have a full-blown prestige panic; we worry that there won’t be enough trophies to go around. Fearful parents urge their children to apply to more schools than ever.
Underlying the hysteria is the belief that scarce elite degrees must be highly valuable. Their graduates must enjoy more success because they get a better education and develop better contacts. All that’s plausible—and mostly wrong. Selective schools don’t systematically employ better instructional approaches than less-selective schools, according to a study. On two measures—professors’ feedback and the number of essay exams—selective schools do slightly worse.
By some studies, selective schools do enhance their graduates’ lifetime earnings. But even this advantage is probably a statistical fluke(侥幸的成功). A well-known study examined students who got into highly selective schools and then went elsewhere. They earned just as much as graduates from higher-status schools.
Kids count more than their colleges. Getting into Yale may signify intelligence, talent and ambition. But it’s nor the only indicator and, paradoxically, its significance is declining. The reason: so many similar people go elsewhere. Getting into college isn’t life’s only competition. In the next competition—the job market, graduate school—the results may change.
So, parents, lighten up. The stakes have been vastly exaggerated. Up to a point, we can rationalize our pushiness. America is a competitive society; our kids need to adjust to that. But too much pushiness can be destructive. The very ambition we impose on our children may get some into Harvard but may also set them up for disappointment.
选项
答案
ticket for life/key to success
解析
由题干中的diploma,Stanford和Princeton定位到文章首段倒数第2句A degree from Stanford or Princeton is the ticket for life.此处需要填入名词性成分,与as一起作regard的宾语补足语.其结构为regard sth.as sth.表示“把…看作”。题目中的diploma与文中的degree近义,根据题意应填入ticket for life/key to success。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3021239.html
相关试题推荐
WhatdoJapanesechildrenfeelfromtheirparents?Theyfeelheavy______fromthe
WhatdoJapanesechildrenfeelfromtheirparents?Theyfeelheavy______fromthe
Afterfinishinghishomeworkhewenton______(write)alettertohisparents.to
Hesaidithadbeen______(increase)difficulttocommunicatewithhisparents.i
Whatdoparentssayaboutthechildren?Parentssaythatchildrendonotshowth
Whatdoparentssayaboutthechildren?Parentssaythatchildrendonotshowth
Imaginethis:yourparentsgoawayonbusiness,butyouhavetostayath
Imaginethis:yourparentsgoawayonbusiness,butyouhavetostayath
Imaginethis:yourparentsgoawayonbusiness,butyouhavetostayath
Onweekendstherearealotofchildrenplayinginthepark,_______parentsseat
随机试题
Culturesaredifferentbecausethelocationstheyexistinarediff
AprilFools’Special:History’sHoaxesHap
下列说法错误的是()。A.抽象是通过特定的实例抽取共同特征以后形成概念的过
某基金销售机构仅在基金投资人首次开户时对其风险承受能力评价一次,并长期使用该评价
根据上级政府的工作安排,某市决定开展该地区的土地调查工作。现已完成了土地权属凋查
Thechangeinthatvillagewasmiraculou
下列对交通组织中车行系统的描述错误的是()。A.避免过境或外部车导入 B
国家发展规划中期评估报告报( )审定后提请全国人民代表大会常务委员会审议。A.
工程建设国家标准、行业标准均可分为()和推荐性标准。A.强制性标准 B.
最新回复
(
0
)