首页
登录
职称英语
There is a phenomena ill the present. The average number of authors on scient
There is a phenomena ill the present. The average number of authors on scient
游客
2023-09-07
23
管理
问题
There is a phenomena ill the present. The average number of authors on scientific papers is skyrocketing. What is the main reason for it? That’s partly because labs are bigger, problems are more complicated, and more different subspecialties are needed. But it’s also because US government agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have started to promote "team science". As physics developed in the post-World War Ⅱ era, federal funds built expensive national facilities, and these served as surfaces on which collaborations could crystallize naturally.
Yet multiple authorship--however good it may be in other ways presents for journals and for the institutions in which these authors work. For the journals, long lists of authors are hard to deal with in themselves. But those long lists give rise to more serious questions when something goes wrong with the paper. If there is research misconduct, should tile liability be joint and several, accruing to all authors? If not, then how should it be allocated among them? If there is an honest mistake in one part of the work but not in others, how should an evaluator aim his or her review?
Various practical or impractical suggestions have emerged during the long-standing debate on this issue. One is that each author should provide, and the journal should then publish, an account of that author’s particular contribution to the work. But a different view of the problem, and perhaps of the solution, comes as we get to university committee on appointments and promotions, which is where the authorship rubber really meets the road. Half a lifetime of involvement with this process has taught me how much authorship matters. I have watched committees attempting to decode sequences of names, agonize over whether a much cited paper was really the candidate’s work or a coauthor’s, and send back recommendations asking for more specificity about the division of responsibility.
Problems of this kind change the argument, supporting the case for asking authors to define their own roles. After all, if quality judgments about individuals are to be made on the basis of their personal contributions, then the judges better know what they did. But if questions arise about the validity of the work as a whole, whether as challenges to its conduct or as evaluations of its influence in the field, a team is a team, and the members should share the credit or the blame. [br] Whether multiple authors of a paper should be taken collectively or individually depends on ______.
选项
A、whether judgments are made about the paper or its authors
B、whether it is the credit or the blame that the authors need to share
C、how many authors are involved in the paper
D、where the paper has been published
答案
A
解析
综合推断题。最后一段第一句指出,这类问题改变了论点,开始支持要求作者们定义自己的角色。这实际上所指的就是题干当中的“文章的作者是应该当作集体来看还是个体看”。文章最后一段从个人投稿的质量及整体作品两方面说明评委们的评判依据。由此可推断,对作者的评判取决于评判是根据整个作品还是根据每个作者来做出的,故答案为A)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2993909.html
相关试题推荐
Scientistssaytheyhavehighhopesforadrugthatcouldonedayprovidea
Scientistssaytheyhavehighhopesforadrugthatcouldonedayprovidea
Scientistssaytheyhavehighhopesforadrugthatcouldonedayprovidea
Thedesireforachievementisoneoflife’sgreatmysteries.Socialscienti
Thedesireforachievementisoneoflife’sgreatmysteries.Socialscienti
Thedesireforachievementisoneoflife’sgreatmysteries.Socialscienti
Thedesireforachievementisoneoflife’sgreatmysteries.Socialscienti
Scientistssaytheyhavehighhopesforadrugthatcouldonedayprovidean
Scientistssaytheyhavehighhopesforadrugthatcouldonedayprovidean
[originaltext](26)Scientistsclaimthatairpollutioncausesadeclinein
随机试题
______writingalettertothemanager,hedecidedtotalktohiminperson.A、In
WouldyouliketoorbittheEarthinsidetheInternationalSpaceStation?No
[originaltext]Amobileofficeis,quiteliterally,anofficewhichiscapab
驾驶机动车遇到车辆出现燃烧现象,应迅速离开车内,以免对呼吸道造成伤害或发生窒息。
Inprojecthumanresourcemanagement,(
某公路工程开展普通混凝配合比设计工作,设计抗压强度等级为C30,请根据规范要求以
医疗机构发生重大医疗事故,主管部门接到报告后应依据《医疗事故处理条例》,立即(
( )的选址,工程地质的影响还要考虑区域地质构造和地质岩性形成的整体滑坡,地下水
甲市乙区卫生健康委员会在一次餐馆卫生检查中,发现ABC三家餐馆不符合卫生标准,此
银行承兑汇票的承兑银行,应当按照票面金额向出票人收取()的手续费。A:千分之一
最新回复
(
0
)