首页
登录
职称英语
A famous US climate scientist at the centre of the "climategate" has been vi
A famous US climate scientist at the centre of the "climategate" has been vi
游客
2023-09-05
21
管理
问题
A famous US climate scientist at the centre of the "climategate" has been virtually cleared of professional misconduct by an internal university inquiry. Michael Mann of Penn State University featured regularly in the more than 1 000 e-mails that were hacked from the University of East Angha (UEA) in the UK last November. His e-mails and comments have since then featured in countless blogs and news articles. Some have claimed the e-mails reveal that many climate scientists have changed data in order to demonstrate that climate change is caused by human activities. The scientists in the e-mails, including Mann, have also been accused of seeking to prevent the publication of doubting research in academic journals.
Penn State University opened an inquiry into Mann’s behavior in November, shortly after the e-mails were leaked into the public attention. After going through 1 075 e-mails and focusing on that were believed relevant to public idea of misconduct by Mann, the inquiry has, by and large, cleared his name. The internal inquiry has found that Mann did not participate in, directly or indirectly, any actions to hide or change data, nor did he remove or otherwise destroy e-mails, information and/or data relating to Climate Change’s 2007 report. One e-mail that has received much media attention was sent to Mann by Phil Jones, then director of the UEA’s Climatic Research Unit. It asked Mann to delete some e-mails regarding the 2007 IPCC report.
The report is not clear about whether Mann’s behavior has harmed the public trust in science. It cites Penn State’s official ethical standards, which says faculty have an obligation to maintain high moral standards in order to raise public trust in science. It then goes on to discuss the fallout from the e-mail leak which, it says, may have driven the public into two camps: one that believes the leak harms climate science and another that does not.
"After careful consideration of all the evidence and relevant materials, the inquiry committee could not make a definitive finding whether there exists any evidence to prove that Dr. Mann did engage in, or participate in, directly or indirectly, any actions against accepted academic practices," reads the report. This final point will now be at the centre of a further investigation.
"This is very much the proof I expected since I am confident I have done nothing wrong," Mann told NewScientist. "I fully support the additional inquiry which may be the best way to remove any remaining doubts." [br] To Mann’s relief, the inquiry opened by Penn State University basically______.
选项
答案
has cleared his name
解析
同义转述题。本题考查宾夕法尼亚州立大学对Mann调查的结果。题干中的basically是对原文中的by and large的同义转述。原文指出,该事件发生后,通过对Mann电邮的认真调查,基本上洗清了他的罪名。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2988736.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]W:ThisisEnglishLanguageCentre.HowcanIhelpyou?M:Yes.I
[originaltext]W:ThisisEnglishLanguageCentre.HowcanIhelpyou?M:Yes.I
Scientistshavecomeupwithatheoryforwhytimeflieswhenyouarehavin
Scientistshavecomeupwithatheoryforwhytimeflieswhenyouarehavin
Scientistshavecomeupwithatheoryforwhytimeflieswhenyouarehavin
Scientistshavecomeupwithatheoryforwhytimeflieswhenyouarehavin
Scientistshavecomeupwithatheoryforwhytimeflieswhenyouarehavin
Scientistshavecomeupwithatheoryforwhytimeflieswhenyouarehavin
Scientistshavecomeupwithatheoryforwhytimeflieswhenyouarehavin
Scientistshavecomeupwithatheoryforwhytimeflieswhenyouarehavin
随机试题
Inmostmessages,thereisanobviousmeaningthataliteralreadingofthe
Muchoftoday’sscienceofphysicsisbasedonNewton’sdiscoveryofthethr
盛行prevail;beinvogue
针对函证,以下说法中不正确的有()。A.函证的目的是确定客户是否存在,以及资产
A.大戟 B.瓜蒌 C.细辛 D.五灵脂 E.朴硝与乌头相反的药物是
A.20℃以下 B.2~10℃ C.用不透光的容器包装 D.避光并不超过2
A.暂时制动 B.单颌结扎 C.颌间结扎 D.切开复位内固定术 E.暂不
隐框和半隐框玻璃幕墙,其玻璃与铝型材的粘结必须采用( )硅酮结构密封胶。A.酸
(2017年真题)为新建项目筹集债务资金时,对利率结构起决定性作用的因素是(
机体的氧消耗在下列哪一类劳动更易进入稳定状态A.登山 B.视频作业 C.徙步
最新回复
(
0
)