The Paris climate agreement finalised in December last year heralded a new e

游客2023-08-10  23

问题     The Paris climate agreement finalised in December last year heralded a new era for climate action. For the first time, the world’s nations agreed to keep global warming well below 2℃.
    This is vital for climate-vulnerable nations. Fewer than 4% of countries are responsible for more than half of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions. In a study published in Nature Scientific Reports, we reveal just how deep this injustice runs.
    Developed nations such as Australia, the United States, Canada, and European countries are essentially climate "free-riders" : causing the majority of the problems through high greenhouse gas emissions, while incurring few of the costs such as climate change’s impact on food and water. In other words, a few countries are benefiting enormously from the consumption of fossil fuels, while at the same time contributing disproportionately to the global burden of climate change.
    On the flip side, there are many " forced riders" , who are suffering from the climate change impacts despite having scarcely contributed to the problem. Many of the world’s most climate-vulnerable countries, the majority of which are African or small island states, produce a very small quantity of emissions. This is much like a non-smoker getting cancer from second-hand smoke, while the heavy smoker is fortunate enough to smoke in good health.
    The Paris agreement has been widely hailed as a positive step forward in addressing climate change for all, although the details on addressing "climate justice" can be best described as sketchy.
    The goal of keeping global temperature rise "well below" 2℃ is commendable but the emissions-reduction pledges submitted by countries leading up to the Paris talks are very unlikely to deliver on this.
    More than $ 100 billion in funding has been put on the table for supporting developing nations to reduce emissions. However, the agreement specifies that there is no formal distinction between developed and developing nations in their responsibility to cut emissions, effectively ignoring historical emissions. There is also very little detail on who will provide the funds or, importantly, who is responsible for their provision. Securing these funds, and establishing who is responsible for raising them will also be vital for the future of climate-vulnerable countries.
    The most climate-vulnerable countries in the world have contributed very little to creating the global disease from which they now suffer the most. There must urgently be a meaningful mobilisation of the policies outlined in the agreement if we are to achieve national emissions reductions while helping the most vulnerable countries adapt to climate change.
    And it is clearly up to the current generation of leaders from high-emitting nations to decide whether they want to be remembered as climate change tyrants or pioneers. [br] What does the author say about the $ 100 billion funding?

选项 A、It will motivate all nations to reduce carbon emissions.
B、There is no final agreement on where it will come from.
C、There is no clarification of how the money will be spent.
D、It will effectively reduce greenhouse emissions worldwide.

答案 B

解析 推理判断题。定位句指出,对于到底由谁来提供这笔资金,尤为重要的是谁应为他们的准备金负责,协议中细节不足。可以推知关于这一千亿美金的来源,还没有达成最后的协议,故答案为B)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2912793.html
最新回复(0)