The Redistribution of Hope "HOPE" is one of the most

游客2023-07-19  21

问题                         The Redistribution of Hope
    "HOPE" is one of the most overused words in public life, up there with "change". Yet it matters enormously. Politicians always pay close attention to right-track/wrong-track indicators. Confidence determines whether consumers spend, and so whether companies invest. The "power of positive thinking", as Norman Vincent Peale pointed out, is enormous.
    For the past 400 years the West has enjoyed a comparative advantage over the rest of the world when it comes to optimism. Western intellectuals dreamed up the ideas of enlightenment and progress, and Western men of affairs harnessed technology to impose their will on the rest of the world. The Founding Fathers of the United States, who firmly believed that the country they created would be better than any that had come before, offered citizens not just life and liberty but also the pursuit of happiness.
Desperation road
    The Westerners’ growing pessimism is reshaping political life. At present, the mood in Washington is as glum as it has been since Jimmy Carter argued that America was suffering from "malaise (不安)". The Democrats’ dream that the country was on the verge of a 1960s-style liberal renaissance foundered in the midterms. But the Republicans are hardly hopeful: their creed leans towards anger and resentment rather than optimism.
    Europe, meanwhile, has seen mass protests, some of them violent, on the streets of Athens, Dublin, London, Madrid, Paris and Rome. If the countries on the European Union’s periphery are down in the dumps it is hardly surprising, but there is pessimism at its more successful core, too. The best-selling book in Germany is Thilo Sarrazin’s Germany Does Away With Itself, a jeremiad (血泪史) about the "fact" that less able women are having more children than their brighter sisters. French intellectuals will soon have Jean-Pierre Chevenement’s Is France Finished? on their shelves alongside Eric Zemmour’s French Melancholy.
    The immediate explanation for this asymmetry (不对称) is the economic crisis, which has not just shaken Westerners’ confidence in the system that they built, but also widened the growth gap between mature and emerging economies. China and India are growing by 10% and 9%, compared with 3% for America and 2% for Europe. Many European countries’ unemployment rates are disgraceful even by their own dismal standards: 41% of young Spaniards are unemployed, for example. And the great American job machine has stalled: one in ten is unemployed and more than a million may have given up looking for work. But the change goes deeper than that—to the dreams that have propelled the West.
    For most of its history America has kept its promise to give its citizens a good chance of living better than their parents. But these days, less than half of Americans think their children’s living standards will be better than theirs. Experience has made them gloomy: the income of the median worker has been more or less stagnant since the mid-1970s, and, thanks to a combination of failing schools and disappearing mid-level jobs, social mobility in America is now among the lowest in the rich world.
    European dreams are different from American ones, but just as important to hopes of a peaceful and prosperous future. They come in two forms: an ever deeper European Union (banishing nationalism) and ever more generous welfare states (offering security). With the break-up of the Euro a possibility, and governments sinking under the burden of unaffordable entitlements as their populations age and the number of workers contracts, those happy notions are evaporating.
Shift happens
    In the emerging world, meanwhile, they are not arguing about pensions, but building colleges. China’s university population has quadrupled (成四倍) in the past two decades. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) notes that the proportion of scientific researchers based in the developing world increased from 30% in 2002 to 38% in 2007. World-class companies such as India’s Infosys and China’s Huawei are beating developed-country competitors.
    The rise of positive thinking in the emerging world is something to be welcomed—not least because it challenges the present situation. Nandan Nilekani of Infosys says that his company’s greatest achievement lies not in producing technology but in redefining the boundaries of the possible. If people in other countries take those ideas seriously, they will make life uncomfortable for the old in China and Arabia.
    But there are dangers, too. Optimism can easily become irrational exuberance (兴奋): asset prices in some emerging markets have risen too high. And there is a danger of a Western backlash. Unless developing countries start taking their responsibility for global security seriously, Americans and Europeans may begin to wonder why they are policing the world to keep markets open for others to get rich.
    As for the Westerners’ gloom, it has its uses. There is a growing recognition that the old rich world cannot take its prosperity for granted—that it will be overtaken by hungrier powers if it fails to deal with its structural problems. Americans are beginning to accept that their country must become less wasteful. Europeans are realizing that they need to make their economies more agile and innovative. Both are beginning to treat this crisis as the opportunity that it is.
    Nor should Westerners overdo the despair, for the emergence of new great powers will benefit them, too. True, their governments will find it harder to boss the rest of the world around; their most desirable properties will increasingly be owned by foreigners; their children will have to work harder to get good jobs in an increasingly globalized economy. But the rising number of Indians, Chinese and Brazilians who can afford to buy their products and services will help their companies prosper. The countries that have provided them with workers will increasingly provide them with customers, too.
    It may not feel like it in the West, but this is, in many ways, the best of times. Hundreds of millions are climbing out of poverty. The Internet gives ordinary people access to information that even the most privileged scholar could not have dreamed of a few years ago. Medical advances are conquering diseases and extending life spans. For most of human history, only a privileged few have reasonably been able to hope that the future would be better than the present. Today the masses everywhere can; and that is surely the reason to be optimistic. [br] Compared with the Democrats, the Republicans tend to be______.

选项 A、less hopeful and less optimistic
B、more confident in political life
C、suffering more from malaise
D、caring more about liberal renaissance

答案 A

解析 细节辨认题。文中将民主党和共和党对生活的态度作了对比,民主党认为国家即将复兴,而共和党却非常失望,他们的信念倾向于愤恨而不是乐观,由此可得出答案为A)“不抱希望和不乐观”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2852007.html
最新回复(0)