首页
登录
职称英语
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announc
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announc
游客
2023-07-19
35
管理
问题
Farewell, Libraries?
Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books came as no surprise. It had to happen sometime. But the news did conjure quite an interesting mental image: libraries that from now on will look smaller and less crowded.
For the moment, let’s not argue with the proposition that people will read as much as they ever have, no matter whether they read an actual book or a book on a screen. The habits of readers may not change (if anything, people may read more, or at least buy more— several stories have quoted e-book owners who say they buy more titles for their e-readers than they did when they were buying hardcover books). But if readers aren’t changing, their environments will. Rooms that once held books will—well, whatever they hold from now on, it won’t be books, or not as many books. Theoretically, your space will be more spare, more serenely uncluttered. That’s the theory, at least. My experience is that stuff expands to fill the space available. But you can dream.
All of this has already happened big time in the music business, where downloads have gradually but surely replaced CDs. I don’t know how many people I’ve overheard crowing because they managed to transfer their entire music collections onto their computers. All those CDs taking up space on the wall have gone—All those CDs that travel from car to kitchen to bedroom to living room, with the CD and the case getting separated somewhere along the way—a problem no more in the digital age. From now on, we’ll own what might be described as the idea of stuff, since the actual physical things—records, tapes, photographs, CDs, and now books—have been as good as vaporized, with the information contained therein stored away on a hard drive.
This, of course, is merely collateral (并行的) damage in the digital revolution, if damage it is. There’s as yet no way to tell if this transition is good, bad, both, or neither, but surely the absence of a physical library, be it musical or literary, marks a fundamental shift in the way we live and think about things. In music, for example, the rise of iTunes, Pandora, YouTube, and all the other online music players has quickly eroded our devotion to the long-playing album as the principal means of organizing music. After a half century of neglect, the lowly single is back on top. Most immediately this has consequences for artists, maybe not so much for the people who buy their music. But who knows?
With books, the absence of packaging does nothing to the contents. I can buy a hardcover copy of Moby-Dick or download it onto an e-reader, and Melville is still Melville. But I grew up loving Rockwell Kent’s illustrations of that novel, and later Barry Moser’s. It’s hard to think of the book without them. I can do that, certainly, but some little thing is lost.
Paperbacks and public libraries made books cheap or free but certainly available to millions who might otherwise not have been able to afford them, and all that happened long before I was born. Nevertheless, I was brought up by people who had been taught—and who taught me—that books were valuable things, things to be cared for and cherished, and I have owned some volumes for close to half a century (almost none of them, I should point out, qualify as "collectible" or valuable to an antiquarian book collector; owning a rare book makes me nervous. I like books I can hold, read, and even—here my mother is spinning in her grave— write in).
I come from a generation for whom the books and records on the shelf signaled, in some way, who you were (starting with the fact that you were a person who owned books or records or CDs). If you visited a friend, you took the first chance you had to secretly scan that friend’s shelves to get a handle on the person. I suppose I could sneak a peek at a friend’s Kindle, but is that the same? And try that kind of snooping on a bus or in a coffee shop and you’ll probably get arrested.
The stuff of our lives is a comfort. We look up at the shelves and we see old friends. Yes, there are books on my shelves that aren’t my friends, that I haven’t finished or even started, but someday I will, I promise—my home library is a physical manifestation of ambivalence. There is comfort in the continuity of seeing the same books year after year. I guess there might be some of the same pleasure in scrolling through a digital library or music play list, but somehow I think something will be lost.
For years audiophiles (音响爱好者) have tried to persuade more casual music fans that a vinyl record played on a decent sound system sounds better than a digital recording played on the same system. Digital sound is not as warm, not as seductive to the ear. The resurgence, albeit modest, of vinyl, especially among young listeners and musicians, proves that this argument is not generational. It’s not, in other words, just old fogies versus young hipsters.
Something of the same argument might be made for books, or for the tactile (触觉的) pleasure of holding and reading a well-made book. At its simplest, a book is a tool, or an information-delivery system, if you will, and it does what it does supremely well. To conceive of a world without physical books is to conceive of a world somehow diminished. It may be more efficient—yes, you can take a "stack" of books on vacation with an e-reader. It may spare quite a few forests from the ax. But efficiency is no substitute for pleasure. The future may be less cluttered. It may also be less fun. [br] Why do some people scan friends’ books and records on the shelf?
选项
A、Because books reflect one’s nature.
B、Because it is polite to do so.
C、Because they want to supply each other’s needs.
D、Because books of others are better.
答案
A
解析
综合推断题。本段首句讲述了一个道理,即一个人所拥有的书能反映出其本性;第二句陈述了一个现象,即你拜访朋友时可能会偷偷地浏览一下朋友书架上有什么书,借此来了解朋友是个什么样的人。通过这两句可知,人们可以“以书取人”,因此,A)“因为书能反映出人的本性”为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2850747.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]M:Hi,Linda!Howhaveyoubeenrecently?W:Iprobablyshouldn’t
[originaltext]M:Hi,Linda!Howhaveyoubeenrecently?W:Iprobablyshouldn’t
[originaltext]M:Hi,Linda!Howhaveyoubeenrecently?W:Iprobablyshouldn’t
Farewell,Libraries?Amazon,corn’srecentannounc
Farewell,Libraries?Amazon,corn’srecentannounc
Farewell,Libraries?Amazon,corn’srecentannounc
[originaltext]Oldagemaynotsoundexciting.Butrecentfindingsoffergoo
[originaltext]Oldagemaynotsoundexciting.Butrecentfindingsoffergoo
[originaltext]W:John,youlookterrific.Areyouworkingoutrecently?Yousur
[originaltext]W:John,youlookterrific.Areyouworkingoutrecently?Yousur
随机试题
ThroughoutGeorgeBush’spresidency,thefederalgovernmenthasrefusedto
抗原抗体反应的最适温度为A.15℃ B.25℃ C.35℃ D.37℃
成本核算对象应该结合企业的不同生产特点加以确定,下列确定成本核算对象的说法中,正
选择营养强化剂有哪些要求
关于房屋建筑工程竣工验收备案事宜的说法,正确的是()。A、建设单位应当自工程竣工
A.血管内皮细胞损伤启动凝血系统B.组织因子释放入血启动凝血系统C.红细胞大量破
如图所示,立方体上叠加圆柱体在打通一个圆柱孔,然后从任意面剖开,下面哪一项不可能
A.1年 B.2年 C.3年 D.5年疾病预防控制机构应当建立购进、分发、
(2018年真题)我国商业银行的单位通知存款的品种有()天通知存款。A.1
肺动脉及其分枝栓塞的栓子来源于A、主动脉瓣的赘生物 B、体静脉和右心房的血栓
最新回复
(
0
)