首页
登录
职称英语
Who Lives? Who Dies? Who Decides?A)Some have called it a Ri
Who Lives? Who Dies? Who Decides?A)Some have called it a Ri
游客
2023-07-05
38
管理
问题
Who Lives? Who Dies? Who Decides?
A)Some have called it a Right to Die case. Others have labeled it a Right to Live case. One group of advocates has called for "death with dignity." Others have responded accusingly, "euthanasia".
B)At the center of the latest controversy about life and death, medicine and law, is a seventy-eight-year-old Massachusetts man whose existence hangs on a court order.
C)On one point, everyone agrees: Earle Spring is not the man he used to be. Once a strapping outdoorsman, he is now called senile by many, and mentally incompetent by the courts. He is, at worst, a member of living dead; at best, a shriveled version of his former self.
D)For more than two years, since his physical and then mental health began to deteriorate , Earle Spring has been kept alive by spending five hours on a kidney dialysis machine three times a week. Since January 1979, his family has pleaded to have him removed from the life-support system.
E)They believe deeply that he Earle Spring who was would not want to live as the Earle Spring who is. They believe they are advocates for the right to die in peace.
F)In the beginning, the court agrees. Possibly for the first time, they reeled last month in favor of withdrawing medical care from an elderly patient whose mind had deteriorated. The dialysis was stopped.
G)But then, in a sudden intervention, an outside nurse and doctor visited Earle Spring and testified that he was alert enough to "make a weak expression of his desire to live." And so the treatments were resumed.
H)Now, while the courts are waiting for new and more thorough evidence about Spring’ s mental state, the controversy rages about legal procedures; no judge ever visited Spring, no psychiatrist ever testified. And even more important, we are again forced to determine one person’ s right to die or to live.
I)This case makes the Karen Ann Quinlan story seem simple in comparison. Quinlan today hangs onto her "life" long after her "plug was pulled." But when the New Jersey court heard that case, Quinlan had no will. She had suffered brain death by any definition.
J)The Spring story is different. He is neither competent nor comatose. He lives in a gray area of consciousness. So the questions also range over the gray area of our consciences.
K)What should the relationship be between mental and physical treatment? Should we treat the incompetent as aggressively as the competent? Should we order heart surgery for one senile citizen? Should we take another off a kidney machine? Who is to decide?
L)Until recently, we didn’t have the technology to keep Earle Spring alive. Until recently, the-life-and-death decisions about the senile elderly or the retarded or the institutionalized were made privately between families and medical people. Now, increasingly, in States like Massachusetts, they are made publicly and legally.
M)Clearly there are no absolutes in this case. No right to die. No right to live. We have to take into account many social as well as medical factors. How much of the resources of a society or a family should be allotted to a member who no longer recognizes it? How many sacrifices should the healthy and vital make for the terminally or permanently ill and disabled?
N)In England, where kidney dialysis machines are scarce, Earle Spring would never have remained on one. In America, one Earle Spring can decimate the energy and income of an entire family.
O)But the Spring case is a crucial, scary one that could affect all those living under that dubious sentence "incompetent" or that shaky diagnosis "senile". So it seems to me that if there is any mental activity at all, then disconnecting him from life would be a dangerous precedent, far more dangerous than letting him continue.
P)The court ruled originally in favor of taking Spring off the machine. It ruled that this is what Earle Spring would have wanted. I have no doubt that his family believes it. I have no doubt of their affection or their pain.
Q)But I remember, too, what my grandfather used to say: No one wants to live to be one hundred until you ask the man who is ninety-nine. Well, no one, including Earle Spring, wants to live to be senile. But once senile, he may well want to live. We simply have to give him the benefit of the doubt. Any doubt. [br] Earle Spring depends on a kidney dialysis machine to sustain life.
选项
答案
D
解析
题干:厄尔·斯普林依靠肾透析来维持生命。题干关键词是kidney dialysis和sustain。文中D段第一句提到,自从厄尔·斯普林身体状况变差,接着又精神状况恶化的两年多以来,他都是靠每周做三次五个小时的肾透析来维持生命。与题干意思吻合,故选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2811469.html
相关试题推荐
RecentlytheBarbicanmuseuminLondonheldanexhibitioncalledtheRainRo
RecentlytheBarbicanmuseuminLondonheldanexhibitioncalledtheRainRo
[originaltext]Peopleovertheageof65intheUSAarecalledseniorcitize
[originaltext]Route66wasonceveryfamousinAmerica.Ithasbeencalled
[originaltext]Route66wasonceveryfamousinAmerica.Ithasbeencalled
Topuniversitieshavebeencalledontopublishlistsof"banned"A-levels
Topuniversitieshavebeencalledontopublishlistsof"banned"A-levels
Topuniversitieshavebeencalledontopublishlistsof"banned"A-levels
Topuniversitieshavebeencalledontopublishlistsof"banned"A-levels
Topuniversitieshavebeencalledontopublishlistsof"banned"A-levels
随机试题
Caughtinasqueezebetweenthehealthneedsofagingpopulationsononehan
过度增长excessivegrowth
Feld,theshoemaker,wasannoyedthathishelper,Sobel,wassoinsensitive
肾素抑制剂的作用机制不包括A.作用于RASS初始环节,减少血管紧张素原向血管紧张
盐酸哌替啶又名A.度冷丁 B.吗啡 C.脑啡肽 D.美散痛 E.美沙酮
缺锌:生长迟缓A.迁徙:季节变化 B.加热:温度升高 C.成年:参加选举
关于社会工作与社会政策的关系,下列表述中错误的是()。A.社会政策与社会工作是
慢性肺心病患者死亡的首要原因是 A.心律失常B.电解质紊乱C.消化道出血
关于合同形式的说法,正确的是()。A.书面形式合同是指纸质合同 B.当事人的行
按国际工程惯例,当采用指定分包商时,应对分包合同规定的工期和质量目标向业主负责的
最新回复
(
0
)