2. 学历类
  3. For the first time in history more peopl

For the first time in history more peopl

admin2022-08-02  71
问题 For the first time in history more people live in towns than in the country. In Britain this has had a curious result. While polls show Britons rate “the countryside” alongside the royal family, Shakespeare and the National Health Service (NHS) as what make them proudest of their country, this has limited political support.　　A century ago Octavia Hill launched the National Trust not to rescue stylish houses but to save “the beauty of natural places for everyone forever”. It was specifically to provide city dwellers with spaces for leisure where they could experience “a refreshing air”. Hill’s pressure later led to the creation of national parks and green belts. They don’t make countryside any more, and every year concrete consumes more of it. It needs constant guardianship.　　At the next election none of the big parties seem likely to endorse this sentiment. The Conservatives’ planning reform explicitly gives rural development priority over conservation, even authorizing “off-plan” building where local people might object. The concept of sustainable development has been defined as profitable. Labour likewise wants to discontinue local planning where councils oppose development. The Liberal Democrats are silent. Only Ukip, sensing its chance, has sided with those pleading for a more considered approach to using green land. Its Campaign to Protect Rural England struck terror into many local Conservative parties.　　The sensible place to build new houses, factories and offices is where people are, in cities and towns where infrastructure is in place. The London agents Stirling Ackroyd recently identified enough sites for half a million houses in the London area alone, with no intrusion on green belts. What is true of London is even truer of the provinces.　　The idea that “housing crisis” equals “concreted meadows” is pure lobby talk. The issue is not the need for more houses but, as always, where to put them. Under lobby pressure, George Osborne favours rural new-build against urban renovation and renewal. He favours out-of-town shopping sites against high streets. This is not a free market but a biased one. Rural towns and villages have grown and will always grow. They do so best where building sticks to their edges and respects their character. We do not ruin urban conservation areas. Why ruin rural ones?　　Development should be planned, not let rip. After the Netherlands, Britain is Europe’s most crowded country. Half a century of town and country planning has enabled it to retain an enviable rural coherence, while still permitting low-density urban living. There is no doubt of the alternative—the corrupted landscapes of southern Portugal, Spain or Ireland. Avoiding this rather than promoting it should unite the left and right of the political spectrum.According to Paragraph 2, the achievements of the National Trust are now being ______.A. largely overshadowedB. properly protectedC. effectively reinforcedD. gradually destroyed
选项 A. largely overshadowed
B. properly protected
C. effectively reinforced
D. gradually destroyed
答案 D
解析 事实细节题。文章第二段提到Octavia Hill成立了National Trust，为城市居民提供休闲的地方，并且在其压力下政府修建了国家公园和绿化带。但最后一句讲到现在“They don’t make countryside any more, and every year concrete consumes more of it”，越来越多的钢筋混凝土侵蚀乡村，也就是在破坏国民信托之前所取得的成就，故D项表述正确。C项与该句意思相反，故排除。A项原文未提及，故排除。第二段最后一句提到“It needs constant guardianship”，也就是说现在没有被适当地保护，所以B项排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/xueli/2698949.html
本试题收录于： 英语一研究生题库研究生入学分类

英语一研究生

研究生入学

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)