首页
登录
职称英语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic j
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic j
游客
2025-05-05
21
管理
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross-examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the Continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal"— essentially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this was eventually abandoned, the two systems parted company. On the Continent, church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jury. The jurymen were often illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their Constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, American lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare them themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case; the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed lo meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. By being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal. [br] The passage ______.
选项
A、questions whether the system of trial by jury can ever be completely efficient
B、suggests a number of reforms which should be made to the legal system of various countries
C、describes how the British legal system works and compares it favourably with other systems
D、compares the legal systems 9fa number of countries and discusses their advantages and disadvantages
答案
D
解析
综合全文,我们可以看到,文章第一段指出了英国法律制度存在的弊端,第二段谈到英国法律制度的优点,第三段谈到英国法律制度相比法国法律制度存在的利弊,第四、第五段则评述了英美国家法律制度的异同。由此我们可以推断全文的主旨是将几国的法律制度相比较并阐述了他们各自的利弊,因此正确答案应当为D。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4063234.html
相关试题推荐
Howefficientisoursystemofcriminaltrial?Doesitreallydothebasicj
Howefficientisoursystemofcriminaltrial?Doesitreallydothebasicj
Howefficientisoursystemofcriminaltrial?Doesitreallydothebasicj
Someresearchersfeelthatcertainpeoplehave______nervoussystems,particula
______ofover5%areattractiveifthedollarreallyisgoingtostabilize.A、Ma
Tosolvesuchadifficultproblemisreally______mygrasp.A、beyondB、outofC、
Thinkaboutwhatwouldmakeyoureally,reallyhappy.Moremoney?Wrong.Smi
Thinkaboutwhatwouldmakeyoureally,reallyhappy.Moremoney?Wrong.Smi
Thinkaboutwhatwouldmakeyoureally,reallyhappy.Moremoney?Wrong.Smi
Thinkaboutwhatwouldmakeyoureally,reallyhappy.Moremoney?Wrong.Smi
随机试题
MyhusbandChristopherwasonceafinancialplanner.Eventhoughhecouldn’t
Theforeignstudentsadvisorrecommendedthatwe(study)______moreEnglishbefor
据说besaidto
【S1】[br]【S2】L本句和上半句联系较紧,同属于被动语态,因为它们是并列关系,故be动词省略,后直接加动词的过去分词。经上下文分析后L项适合本空。
投资性房地产的后续计量模式包括()。A.成本模式 B.公允价值模式 C
以下发作类型中,哪项属于全身性发作A.精神症状性发作 B.失张力发作 C.复
(2021年真题)一般而言,基金全部资产的价值总和指的是()A.基金总负债
各种运输方式内外部的各个方面的构成和联系,就是( )。 A.运输系统
某公司要买100本便签纸和100支胶棒,附近有两家超市。A超市的便签纸0.8元一
电子邮政发展的物质技术基础包括()。A:邮政综合计算机网 B:邮政实物运递网
最新回复
(
0
)