首页
登录
职称英语
If you were told that a particularly delicious-looking ice-cream cone(圆筒)con
If you were told that a particularly delicious-looking ice-cream cone(圆筒)con
游客
2024-02-09
47
管理
问题
If you were told that a particularly delicious-looking ice-cream cone(圆筒)contained dangerous chemicals, then told soon after that it was safe to eat after all, would you still choose it for dessert? So far, studies by behavioural economists have suggested that people have a hard time unlearning(忘记)what they have previously been told, even after being ordered to do so. But Uri Simonsohn, a professor of marketing at the University of Pennsylvania, has a forthcoming paper suggesting that some consumers, at least, are indeed capable of letting go of wrong information.
Mr. Simonsohn started by having to dismiss wrong information himself. In early 2007, shortly after he and his wife had bought a car seat for their first child, Consumer Reports magazine published a ranking of car seats according to safety. Unfortunately, the magazine had messed up its usually thorough testing procedure, with cars being crashed at much higher speeds than advertised. At a 35-mph side-impact crash, the structure of the car seat can make a difference; at 70 mph, the infant’s safety depends much more on the structure of the car. Two weeks later, Consumer Reports issued a retraction(收回声明): several car seat brands(including the Simonsohns’)were safer than the original rankings suggested. Mr. Simonsohn tracked online auctions of car seats after both the initial rankings and the retractions, to see how prices were affected. The car seats falsely charged with poor performance saw their prices drop, then rebound quickly. By contrast, one seat, which failed both Consumer Reports’ original and revised tests, continued to sell more cheaply after the retraction was issued. The car-seat buyers were apparently able to disregard the flawed rankings and pay attention to the correct information.
It helps, Mr. Simonsohn admits, that both the original rankings and the retraction were widely publicised: child-safety issues attract headlines. That the retraction was made swiftly may also have focussed consumers’ attention: a time lapse of months or more might have affected sales more profoundly. [br] Why did the author mention the ice-cream cone case?
选项
A、To warn consumers that the ice-cream cone is dangerous.
B、To tell consumers it is safe to eat the ice-cream cone.
C、To illustrate it’s hard for people to unlearn something.
D、To emphasize the issue of food safety.
答案
C
解析
推理判断题。根据定位句可知,作者以冰激凌蛋筒为例,主要是为了表达第二句的观点,即人们很难忘记他们以前被告知的事情,由此推出C)为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3436212.html
相关试题推荐
Ifyouweretoldthataparticularlydelicious-lookingice-creamcone(圆筒)con
Ifyouweretoldthataparticularlydelicious-lookingice-creamcone(圆筒)con
Ifyouweretoldthataparticularlydelicious-lookingice-creamcone(圆筒)con
Ifyouweretoldthataparticularlydelicious-lookingice-creamcone(圆筒)con
Ifyouweretoldthataparticularlydelicious-lookingice-creamcone(圆筒)con
Ifyouweretoldthataparticularlydelicious-lookingice-creamcone(圆筒)con
Ifyouweretoldthataparticularlydelicious-lookingice-creamcone(圆筒)con
Ifyouweretoldthataparticularlydelicious-lookingice-creamcone(圆筒)con
[originaltext]Theice-creamsundaeisanoriginalAmericandish.Icecream
[originaltext]Theice-creamsundaeisanoriginalAmericandish.Icecream
随机试题
[originaltext]W:Themapshowsthatthisstreetgoesdowntown.M:Yes,butwhat
PassageFour[br]WherewouldIreneprobablyputtheuglynewradio?Concealitb
以下关于贷款利率的说法错误的一项是( )。A.根据贷款币种的不同将利率分为本币
糖尿病最常见最严重的急性并发症是A.心血管病变 B.非特异性感染 C.
板印书籍,唐人尚未盛为之,自冯瀛王①已后,典籍皆为板本。庆历②中,有布衣毕昇又为
根据《历史文化名城名镇名村保护条例》的规定,不属于行政责任的是()。A.地
2017年2月1日,甲、乙、丙投资设立一个有限责任公司。章程约定甲、乙、丙各自投
简述学生的认识有哪些特殊性。
一住店客人未付房钱即想离开旅馆去车站。旅馆服务员揪住他不让走,并打报警电话。客人
甲国民航客机在途径乙国时遭丙国人阿里的劫持,飞机被迫在乙国降落。阿里逃脱时伤两名
最新回复
(
0
)