首页
登录
职称英语
If you were told that a particularly delicious-looking ice-cream cone(圆筒)con
If you were told that a particularly delicious-looking ice-cream cone(圆筒)con
游客
2024-02-09
42
管理
问题
If you were told that a particularly delicious-looking ice-cream cone(圆筒)contained dangerous chemicals, then told soon after that it was safe to eat after all, would you still choose it for dessert? So far, studies by behavioural economists have suggested that people have a hard time unlearning(忘记)what they have previously been told, even after being ordered to do so. But Uri Simonsohn, a professor of marketing at the University of Pennsylvania, has a forthcoming paper suggesting that some consumers, at least, are indeed capable of letting go of wrong information.
Mr. Simonsohn started by having to dismiss wrong information himself. In early 2007, shortly after he and his wife had bought a car seat for their first child, Consumer Reports magazine published a ranking of car seats according to safety. Unfortunately, the magazine had messed up its usually thorough testing procedure, with cars being crashed at much higher speeds than advertised. At a 35-mph side-impact crash, the structure of the car seat can make a difference; at 70 mph, the infant’s safety depends much more on the structure of the car. Two weeks later, Consumer Reports issued a retraction(收回声明): several car seat brands(including the Simonsohns’)were safer than the original rankings suggested. Mr. Simonsohn tracked online auctions of car seats after both the initial rankings and the retractions, to see how prices were affected. The car seats falsely charged with poor performance saw their prices drop, then rebound quickly. By contrast, one seat, which failed both Consumer Reports’ original and revised tests, continued to sell more cheaply after the retraction was issued. The car-seat buyers were apparently able to disregard the flawed rankings and pay attention to the correct information.
It helps, Mr. Simonsohn admits, that both the original rankings and the retraction were widely publicised: child-safety issues attract headlines. That the retraction was made swiftly may also have focussed consumers’ attention: a time lapse of months or more might have affected sales more profoundly. [br] Why did the author mention the ice-cream cone case?
选项
A、To warn consumers that the ice-cream cone is dangerous.
B、To tell consumers it is safe to eat the ice-cream cone.
C、To illustrate it’s hard for people to unlearn something.
D、To emphasize the issue of food safety.
答案
C
解析
推理判断题。根据定位句可知,作者以冰激凌蛋筒为例,主要是为了表达第二句的观点,即人们很难忘记他们以前被告知的事情,由此推出C)为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3436212.html
相关试题推荐
Ifyouweretoldthataparticularlydelicious-lookingice-creamcone(圆筒)con
Ifyouweretoldthataparticularlydelicious-lookingice-creamcone(圆筒)con
Ifyouweretoldthataparticularlydelicious-lookingice-creamcone(圆筒)con
Ifyouweretoldthataparticularlydelicious-lookingice-creamcone(圆筒)con
Ifyouweretoldthataparticularlydelicious-lookingice-creamcone(圆筒)con
Ifyouweretoldthataparticularlydelicious-lookingice-creamcone(圆筒)con
Ifyouweretoldthataparticularlydelicious-lookingice-creamcone(圆筒)con
Ifyouweretoldthataparticularlydelicious-lookingice-creamcone(圆筒)con
[originaltext]Theice-creamsundaeisanoriginalAmericandish.Icecream
[originaltext]Theice-creamsundaeisanoriginalAmericandish.Icecream
随机试题
Manypeoplebelievetheglarefromsnowcausessnowblindness.Yet,darkgla
Moneyisusedforbuyingorsellinggoods,formeasuringvalueandforstori
[originaltext][5]Atthisweek’sCEStechnologyexpo,LGwillbeoneofmany
大流动性混凝土是指拌合物坍落度不低于()的混凝土。A.140mm B.1
A.生后感染性肺炎 B.宫内感染性肺炎 C.新生儿肺透明膜病 D.胎粪吸入
A.脾胃虚弱 B.食滞胃脘 C.湿热蕴脾 D.胃火炽盛 E.胃阴不足饥不
(2021年真题)根据《民法典》下列完全民事行为能力人所立的,且已注明或记录年月
智育就是知识教育。()
女,18岁。近几个月来常因琐事与父母发生激烈争吵,闷闷不乐,被诊断为抑郁症而入院
(2021年真题)某高速公路甲市乙区路段,一辆小型面包车与—辆重型罐车相撞,导致
最新回复
(
0
)