首页
登录
职称英语
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income s
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income s
游客
2024-01-31
48
管理
问题
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income students shows that a record number of the nation’s school districts will receive less in the coming academic year than they did for the one just ended.
For the 2005-2006 school year, spending under the Department of Education’s Title I program, which helps low-achieving children in high-poverty areas, is increasing by 3.2 percent, to $12.6 billion. But because of population shifts, growing numbers of poor children, newer census data and complex formulas that determine how the money is divided, more than two-thirds of the districts, or 8,843, will not receive as much financing as before.
The analysis, based on data from the department, was made by the Center on Education Policy, a group advocating for public schools. A similar study by the group last year showed that 55 percent of the schools would receive less money than they did in the previous year.
"It’s an alarming number," said Tom Fagan, a former department official who conducted the analysis. "It’s clear that the amount of overall increase is not keeping pace with the number of poor kids."
Susan Aspey, a department spokeswoman, defended the spending levels for Title I, saying, "President Bush and Congress have invested record amounts of funding to help the nation’s neediest students."
But Mr. Fagan said the increasing number of districts that are losing money is making it harder for the schools to meet the goals of the federal No Child Left Behind Act, the Bush administration’s signature education program, which measures progress through annual tests in math, reading and science. That is giving critics of the program more grounds to accuse the administration of not sufficiently financing the program while demanding greater results.
Title I provides the largest component of financing for No Child Left Behind.
"The federal government is concentrating more money in fewer districts," said John F. Jennings, the president and chief executive of the Center on Education Policy. "It means there is lots of anger and lots of tension. They’re asking us to do more and more with less and less." [br] According to Tom Fagan, _____.
选项
A、the government has done its best to finance the poor children
B、the goals of No Child Left Behind Act are difficult to realize
C、the way of measuring progress by annual tests should be changed
D、the Bush government shouldn’t have approved the Title I program
答案
B
解析
推理判断题。本题考查对复合句的理解。由文中第6段第1句中的harder…to meet…可知选项B正确。选项C最具干扰性,要排除这个干扰,关键是要理解第6段第1句中由which引导的非限制性定语从句的作用。这个从句是对前面"the Bush administration’s signature education program"的附加事实信息,不属于汤姆.法甘的看法。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3408316.html
相关试题推荐
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.The
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.The
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.The
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.The
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.The
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.The
Thesedays,peoplewhodo【C1】______workoftenreceivefarmoremoneythanpe
Thesedays,peoplewhodo【C1】______workoftenreceivefarmoremoneythanpe
Thesedays,peoplewhodo【C1】______workoftenreceivefarmoremoneythanpe
Thesedays,peoplewhodo【C1】______workoftenreceivefarmoremoneythanpe
随机试题
ThemainreasonweexploreMarsistodetermineiflifeeverexistedonthe
关于“城市设计”的说法,错误的是( )。A.从“质”和“量”两方面,研究城市空
设有关系模式R(课程,教师,学生,成绩,时间,教室),其中函数依赖集F如下:F=
以下哪个选项不是二磷酸果糖的不良反应()A:尿潜血、血色素尿 B:低钾血症
羚角钩藤汤的功用是()A.镇肝息风,滋阴潜阳 B.平肝息风,清热活血
某城市某类住房需求价格弹性系数为0,表明该城市该类住房的需求价格弹性类型是(
肺栓塞患者出现低氧血症最主要的机制是( )。A.肺泡通气量下降 B.弥散障碍
下列歌曲涉及到的历史事件按照时间先后排列正确的一项是: ①花篮的花儿香,听我来
既有第一信使特征,也有第二信使特征的信使分子是A.钙离子 B.神经递质 C.
硬化混凝土抗渗性的主要影响因素是()。A.混凝土的灰砂比 B.混凝土的水灰比
最新回复
(
0
)